GeForce3 Ti 500 vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce3 Ti 500
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce3 Ti 500 is positioned at rank #390 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce3 Ti 500
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 417733.3% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce3 Ti 500.
| Insight | GeForce3 Ti 500 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-417733.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+417733.3%) |
| Longevity | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $209 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 97860.9% better value per dollar than the GeForce3 Ti 500.
| Insight | GeForce3 Ti 500 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+97860.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($209) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce3 Ti 500 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce3 Ti 500
The GeForce3 Ti 500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $1,999.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 500 scores 3 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 417733.3%. The GeForce3 Ti 500 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) with 680 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 12,535+417733% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+750% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+1052% | 9.098 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz+35% | 1777 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+450% | 32 |
| TMUs | 680+750% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+752% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+4700% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 170+750% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 680+750% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce3 Ti 500 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce3 Ti 500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 8 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+4700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.4. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1 | 12 Ultimate+48% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 4.6+207% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: MPEG-2 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce3 Ti 500 draws 575W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 126.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 183mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 66°C.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 130W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 183mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 66°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 96.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce3 Ti 500 launched at $349 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 and now averages $209. The GeForce3 Ti 500 costs 76.6% less ($160 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 59900% better value. The GeForce3 Ti 500 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $249-29% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-77% | $209 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 60.0+59900% |
| Codename | GB202 | GA106 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #3 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce3 Ti 500 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
