GeForce3 Ti 500 vs GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce3 Ti 500
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce3 Ti 500 is positioned at rank #390 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce3 Ti 500
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 897200% higher G3D Mark score and 2300% more VRAM (12 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce3 Ti 500.
| Insight | GeForce3 Ti 500 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-897200%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+897200%) |
| Longevity | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $550 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 79841.3% better value per dollar than the GeForce3 Ti 500.
| Insight | GeForce3 Ti 500 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+79841.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce3 Ti 500 and GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce3 Ti 500
The GeForce3 Ti 500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $1,999.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 500 scores 3 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 897200%. The GeForce3 Ti 500 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 680 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 26,919+897200% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+270% | 5888 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+260% | 29.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz | 2475 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 176+175% | 64 |
| TMUs | 680+270% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+267% | 5.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+167% | 36 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 170+270% | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | 680+270% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce3 Ti 500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce3 Ti 500 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 2300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce3 Ti 500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 12 GB+2300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+167% | 36 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1 | 12.2+51% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 4.6+207% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: MPEG-2 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce3 Ti 500 draws 575W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 96.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 183mm vs 304mm, occupying 1 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 200W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 183mm | 304mm |
| Height | 0mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 1-67% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 134.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce3 Ti 500 launched at $349 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 and now averages $550. The GeForce3 Ti 500 costs 91.1% less ($501 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce3 Ti 500) vs 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 48800% better value. The GeForce3 Ti 500 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 500 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-42% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-91% | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 48.9+48800% |
| Codename | GB202 | AD104 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #3 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce3 Ti 500 and GeForce RTX 4070
