GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

2012

Why buy it

✅+50% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
✅Draws 32W instead of 50W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 6).
❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌56.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 32W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 440 Go 64M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 50% in PassMark G3D (6 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce4 440 Go 64M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 65 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

MOBILITY RADEON 7500 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce4 440 Go 64M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 440 Go 64M scores 6 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 4 — the GeForce4 440 Go 64M leads by 50%. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is built on Kepler while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Raw compute: 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7500).

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	MOBILITY RADEON 7500
G3D Mark Score	6+50%	4
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5445 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS+106%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	32 KB	80 KB+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 carries 65 MB. GeForce4 440 Go 64M gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 440 Go 64M and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 7500.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	MOBILITY RADEON 7500
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+694%	0.063 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 7.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	MOBILITY RADEON 7500
DirectX	7.0	7.0
OpenGL	1.5+15%	1.3
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M draws 32W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 50W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	MOBILITY RADEON 7500
TDP	32W-36%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85	70°C-18%
Perf/Watt	0.2+100%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce4 440 Go 64M (2012 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP	—	$49
Codename	GK107	Broadway
Release	October 1 2012	January 7 2010
Ranking	#903	#846

Search GeForce4 440 Go 64M on Amazon

Search MOBILITY RADEON 7500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.