MOBILITY RADEON 7500 vs RADEON 9200 SE
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Popular choices:
RADEON 9200 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is positioned at rank 744 and the RADEON 9200 SE is on rank 742, so the RADEON 9200 SE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9200 SE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON 9200 SE is significantly newer (2025 vs 2010). The RADEON 9200 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON 9200 SE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+296.8%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $15 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 33.3% better value per dollar than the RADEON 9200 SE.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+33.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 7500 and RADEON 9200 SE
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
RADEON 9200 SE
The RADEON 9200 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 scores 4 versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 3 — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 leads by 33.3%. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON 9200 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9200 SE). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200 SE).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4+33% | 3 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2560+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 14.85 TFLOPS+1226% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 160+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 SE has 256 MB. The RADEON 9200 SE offers 296.8% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9200 SE) — the RADEON 9200 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.25 GB+297% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 8.1 (RADEON 9200 SE). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.1+16% |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 draws 50W versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 55W — a 9.5% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 350W (RADEON 9200 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 60.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-9% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 60-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the RADEON 9200 SE launched at $30 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 0.2 (RADEON 9200 SE) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers 50% better value. The RADEON 9200 SE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $30-39% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3+50% | 0.2 |
| Codename | Broadway | Strix Halo |
| Release | January 7 2010 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #846 | #98 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on MOBILITY RADEON 7500 and RADEON 9200 SE
