RADEON 7200 vs RADEON 9000

AMD

RADEON 7200

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON 9000

2024Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

RADEON 7200 vs RADEON 9000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON 7200 vs RADEON 9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON 7200

2019

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 5).
  • 2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 102% HIGHER MSRP
    $99 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

RADEON 9000

2024

Why buy it

  • +66.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • Delivers 236.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON 9000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 66.7% in PassMark G3D (5 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON 9000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON 9000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 236.7% (0.1 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

RADEON 7200 vs RADEON 9000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

RADEON 7200

The RADEON 7200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

AMD

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 7200 scores 3 versus the RADEON 9000's 5 — the RADEON 9000 leads by 66.7%. The RADEON 7200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the RADEON 9000 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON 7200) vs 1,024 (RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 7200) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

FeatureRADEON 7200RADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score
3
5+67%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
384
1024+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7864 TFLOPS
5.939 TFLOPS+655%
Boost Clock
1024 MHz
2900 MHz+183%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
64+167%
L1 Cache
96 KB
256 KB+167%
L2 Cache
0.13 MB
2 MB+1438%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON 7200RADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 7200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9000 carries 128 MB. RADEON 7200 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the RADEON 7200 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9000. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (RADEON 7200) vs 2 MB (RADEON 9000) — the RADEON 9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRADEON 7200RADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+300%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.13 MB
2 MB+1438%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 7200 draws 50W versus the RADEON 9000's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 7200) vs 350W (RADEON 9000). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

FeatureRADEON 7200RADEON 9000
TDP
50W
15W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.3+200%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON 7200 came in at $99, while the RADEON 9000 launched at $49. On MSRP, RADEON 9000 was 50.5% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (RADEON 7200) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9000) — the RADEON 9000 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9000 (2024 vs 2019).

FeatureRADEON 7200RADEON 9000
MSRP
$99
$49-51%
Performance per Dollar
0.0
0.1
Codename
Polaris 24
Strix Point
Release
May 13 2019
July 15 2024
Ranking
#898
#312

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.