
RADEON 7200

RADEON 9000
RADEON 7200 vs RADEON 9000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RADEON 7200 vs RADEON 9000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RADEON 7200 vs RADEON 9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RADEON 7200
2019Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 5).
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌102% HIGHER MSRP$99 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.
RADEON 9000
2024Why buy it
- ✅+66.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 236.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON 7200 vs RADEON 9000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON 7200
The RADEON 7200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

RADEON 9000
The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 7200 scores 3 versus the RADEON 9000's 5 — the RADEON 9000 leads by 66.7%. The RADEON 7200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the RADEON 9000 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON 7200) vs 1,024 (RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 7200) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON 7200 | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 5+67% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1024+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 5.939 TFLOPS+655% |
| Boost Clock | 1024 MHz | 2900 MHz+183% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 256 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 2 MB+1438% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 7200 | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 7200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9000 carries 128 MB. RADEON 7200 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the RADEON 7200 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9000. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (RADEON 7200) vs 2 MB (RADEON 9000) — the RADEON 9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 7200 | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 2 MB+1438% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 7200 draws 50W versus the RADEON 9000's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 7200) vs 350W (RADEON 9000). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON 7200 | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 15W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.3+200% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the RADEON 7200 came in at $99, while the RADEON 9000 launched at $49. On MSRP, RADEON 9000 was 50.5% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (RADEON 7200) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9000) — the RADEON 9000 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9000 (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | RADEON 7200 | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $49-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | Strix Point |
| Release | May 13 2019 | July 15 2024 |
| Ranking | #898 | #312 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














