GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RADEON IGP 320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RADEON IGP 320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RADEON IGP 320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅18480.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 141823.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

RADEON IGP 320

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18480.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 566175% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 4), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while RADEON IGP 320 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 7nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $299 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 141823.6% (56.8 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RADEON IGP 320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RADEON IGP 320's 4 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 566175%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RADEON IGP 320 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2200 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 72 (RADEON IGP 320) with 136 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RADEON IGP 320
G3D Mark Score	22,651+566175%	4
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4352	4608+6%
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+9%	20.28 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+15%	2200 MHz
ROPs	48	128+167%
TMUs	136	288+112%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+330%	1 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	34	72+112%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RADEON IGP 320 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON IGP 320 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RADEON IGP 320
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON IGP 320 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 320. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RADEON IGP 320
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+1500%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RADEON IGP 320's 300W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 320). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RADEON IGP 320
TDP	160W-47%	300W
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	Legacy
Length	240mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	141.6	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100. On MSRP, RADEON IGP 320 was 74.9% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.0 (RADEON IGP 320) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2021).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RADEON IGP 320
MSRP	$399	$100-75%
Performance per Dollar	56.8	0.0
Codename	AD106	Navi 21
Release	May 18 2023	November 4 2021
Ranking	#59	#136

Search GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on Amazon

Search RADEON IGP 320 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.