
MOBILITY RADEON 9200

RADEON IGP 320
MOBILITY RADEON 9200 vs RADEON IGP 320 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
MOBILITY RADEON 9200 vs RADEON IGP 320 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
MOBILITY RADEON 9200 vs RADEON IGP 320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 53.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 300W, a 250W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
RADEON IGP 320
2021Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
- ✅MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON IGP 320 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌104.1% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌500% higher power demand at 300W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON 9200 vs RADEON IGP 320 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9200
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

RADEON IGP 320
The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 scores 3 versus the RADEON IGP 320's 4 — the RADEON IGP 320 leads by 33.3%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON IGP 320 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 4+33% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 4608+476% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 20.28 TFLOPS+1711% |
| ROPs | 16 | 128+700% |
| TMUs | 40 | 288+620% |
| L1 Cache | 0.08 MB | 1 MB+1150% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON IGP 320 carries 512 MB. RADEON IGP 320 gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 320. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.5 GB+694% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 draws 50W versus the RADEON IGP 320's 300W — a 142.9% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 320). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-83% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 came in at $49, while the RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON 9200 was 51% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 0.0 (RADEON IGP 320) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON IGP 320 (2021 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-51% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Codename | Broadway | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | November 4 2021 |
| Ranking | #846 | #136 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














