MOBILITY RADEON 9200 vs RADEON IGP 320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is positioned at rank 745 and the RADEON IGP 320 is on rank 424, so the RADEON IGP 320 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9200

#735

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

180950%

#737

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

164033%

#738

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

163600%

#742

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

148767%

#743

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

147750%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

100%

#746

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

100%

#747

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

83%

#748

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

67%

#749

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

67%

#750

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

50%

#751

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

50%

#752

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

50%

#753

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

50%

#754

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

33%

#755

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

17%

#756

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

17%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 320

#409

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

369325%

#424

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

100%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

50%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

25%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON IGP 320 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2010). The RADEON IGP 320 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON IGP 320 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score and 693.7% more VRAM (512 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9200.

Insight	MOBILITY RADEON 9200	RADEON IGP 320
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+693.7%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

MOBILITY RADEON 9200 Benchmark Check

RADEON IGP 320 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 9200 and RADEON IGP 320

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 scores 3 versus the RADEON IGP 320's 4 — the RADEON IGP 320 leads by 33.3%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON IGP 320 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9200	RADEON IGP 320
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	800	4608+476%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS	20.28 TFLOPS+1711%
ROPs	16	128+700%
TMUs	40	288+620%
L1 Cache	0.08 MB	1 MB+1150%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9200	RADEON IGP 320
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON IGP 320 has 512 MB. The RADEON IGP 320 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9200	RADEON IGP 320
VRAM Capacity	0.063 GB	0.5 GB+694%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 draws 50W versus the RADEON IGP 320's 300W — a 142.9% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 320). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9200	RADEON IGP 320
TDP	50W-83%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100 and now averages $20. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 0.2 (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 offers 0% better value. The RADEON IGP 320 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2010).