GeForce4 MX 460 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce4 MX 460 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce4 MX 460 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce4 MX 460

2010

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅98.4% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (128 MB vs 65 MB).
✅More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
265.3% HIGHER MSRP
$179 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
❌16400% longer card at 165mm vs 1mm.

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
✅Delivers 174% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 165mm, a 164mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 128 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 MX 460 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce4 MX 460 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 128 MB vs 65 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

MOBILITY RADEON 9200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $130 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $179, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 174% (0.1 vs 0.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce4 MX 460 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce4 MX 460 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 MX 460

The GeForce4 MX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $229.

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 460 scores 4 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9200's 3 — the GeForce4 MX 460 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce4 MX 460 is built on Fermi while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 336 (GeForce4 MX 460) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Raw compute: 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 460) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9200).

Feature	GeForce4 MX 460	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	Fermi	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	336	800+138%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9072 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS+23%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+40%	40
L1 Cache	448 KB+460%	80 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce4 MX 460 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 460	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce4 MX 460 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 carries 65 MB. GeForce4 MX 460 gives you 98.4% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 460 and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9200. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce4 MX 460) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) — the GeForce4 MX 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 460	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB+98%	0.063 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 460) vs 8.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 460	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
DirectX	7.0	8.1+16%
Max Displays	1	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 MX 460 draws 160W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9200's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 460) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 460	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
TDP	160W	50W-69%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	165mm	1mm
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	60°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce4 MX 460 came in at $179, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 launched at $49. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON 9200 was 72.6% cheaper ($130 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce4 MX 460) vs 0.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers 100+% better value.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 460	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP	$179	$49-73%
Performance per Dollar	0.0	0.1
Codename	GF104	Broadway
Release	July 12 2010	January 7 2010
Ranking	#652	#846

Search GeForce4 MX 460 on Amazon

Search MOBILITY RADEON 9200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.