
GeForce4 MX 460

RADEON 7500
GeForce4 MX 460 vs RADEON 7500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce4 MX 460 vs RADEON 7500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce4 MX 460 vs RADEON 7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce4 MX 460
2010Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 48.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅98.4% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (128 MB vs 65 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
RADEON 7500
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 128 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌11.2% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 MX 460 vs RADEON 7500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 MX 460
The GeForce4 MX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $229.

RADEON 7500
The RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 460 scores 4 versus the RADEON 7500's 3 — the GeForce4 MX 460 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce4 MX 460 is built on Fermi while the RADEON 7500 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce4 MX 460) vs 512 (RADEON 7500). Raw compute: 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 460) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON 7500).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 460 | RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4+33% | 3 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 336 | 512+52% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9072 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+33% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+75% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+250% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce4 MX 460 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 7500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 460 | RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce4 MX 460 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 7500 carries 65 MB. GeForce4 MX 460 gives you 98.4% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 460 and 128-bit on the RADEON 7500. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce4 MX 460) vs 256 KB (RADEON 7500) — the GeForce4 MX 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 460 | RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB+98% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 460) vs 8.1 (RADEON 7500). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 460 | RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.1+16% |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce4 MX 460) vs Legacy (RADEON 7500). Decoder: No vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 460 | RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | Legacy |
| Decoder | No | Legacy |
| Codecs | MPEG-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 MX 460 draws 160W versus the RADEON 7500's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The RADEON 7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 460) vs 350W (RADEON 7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 460 | RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 165mm | — |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce4 MX 460 came in at $179, while the RADEON 7500 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 460 was 10.1% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce4 MX 460) vs 0.0 (RADEON 7500) — the RADEON 7500 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 7500 (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 460 | RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179-10% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GF104 | Lexa |
| Release | July 12 2010 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #652 | #668 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














