
GeForce4 440 Go 64M

GeForce4 MX 460
GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs GeForce4 MX 460 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs GeForce4 MX 460 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs GeForce4 MX 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce4 440 Go 64M
2012Why buy it
- ✅+50% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 32W instead of 160W, a 128W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
GeForce4 MX 460
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 6).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 160W vs 32W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs GeForce4 MX 460 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M
The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

GeForce4 MX 460
The GeForce4 MX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 440 Go 64M scores 6 versus the GeForce4 MX 460's 4 — the GeForce4 440 Go 64M leads by 50%. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is built on Kepler while the GeForce4 MX 460 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 336 (GeForce4 MX 460). Raw compute: 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 460).
| Feature | GeForce4 440 Go 64M | GeForce4 MX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6+50% | 4 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+14% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5445 TFLOPS | 0.9072 TFLOPS+67% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 56+75% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 448 KB+1300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 440 Go 64M | GeForce4 MX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce4 440 Go 64M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 460 carries 128 MB. GeForce4 440 Go 64M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 440 Go 64M and 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 460. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 512 KB (GeForce4 MX 460) — the GeForce4 MX 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 Go 64M | GeForce4 MX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 460). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 Go 64M | GeForce4 MX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 1.5+15% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs No (GeForce4 MX 460). Decoder: MPEG-2 VPE vs No.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 Go 64M | GeForce4 MX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 VPE | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 440 Go 64M draws 32W versus the GeForce4 MX 460's 160W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 165mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 Go 64M | GeForce4 MX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 32W-80% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 165mm |
| Height | 0mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 60°C-29% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce4 440 Go 64M (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce4 440 Go 64M | GeForce4 MX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $179 |
| Codename | GK107 | GF104 |
| Release | October 1 2012 | July 12 2010 |
| Ranking | #903 | #652 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













