
MOBILITY RADEON 9200 vs Radeon VE

MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Popular choices:

Radeon VE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is positioned at rank #745 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon VE is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The Radeon VE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 50% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon VE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | Radeon VE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+50%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-50%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+693.7%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the Radeon VE, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 390% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | Radeon VE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+390%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 9200 and Radeon VE

MOBILITY RADEON 9200
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

Radeon VE
The Radeon VE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 7 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1750 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 scores 3 versus the Radeon VE's 2 — the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 leads by 50%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon VE uses GCN 5.1, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 3,840 (Radeon VE). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 13.44 TFLOPS (Radeon VE).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | Radeon VE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3+50% | 2 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 3840+380% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 13.44 TFLOPS+1100% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 240+500% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 960 KB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | Radeon VE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon VE has 512 MB. The Radeon VE offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 4 MB (Radeon VE) — the Radeon VE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | Radeon VE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.5 GB+694% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 7_0 (Radeon VE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | Radeon VE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1+16% | 7_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 draws 50W versus the Radeon VE's 295W — a 142% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 350W (Radeon VE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 165mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | Radeon VE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-83% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 165mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon VE launched at $0 and now averages $49. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 0.0 (Radeon VE) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers 100+% better value. The Radeon VE is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | Radeon VE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-69% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Codename | Broadway | Vega 20 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | February 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #846 | #125 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















