
MOBILITY RADEON 9200

Radeon VE
MOBILITY RADEON 9200 vs Radeon VE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
MOBILITY RADEON 9200 vs Radeon VE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
MOBILITY RADEON 9200 vs Radeon VE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
2010Why buy it
- ✅+50% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 295W, a 245W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 165mm, a 164mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon VE
2019Why buy it
- ✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
- ✅MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon VE is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2 vs 3).
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌490% higher power demand at 295W vs 50W.
- ❌16400% longer card at 165mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON 9200 vs Radeon VE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9200
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

Radeon VE
The Radeon VE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 7 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1750 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 scores 3 versus the Radeon VE's 2 — the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 leads by 50%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon VE uses GCN 5.1, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 3,840 (Radeon VE). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 13.44 TFLOPS (Radeon VE).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | Radeon VE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3+50% | 2 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 3840+380% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 13.44 TFLOPS+1100% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 240+500% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 960 KB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | Radeon VE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon VE carries 512 MB. Radeon VE gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 and 64-bit on the Radeon VE. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 4 MB (Radeon VE) — the Radeon VE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | Radeon VE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.5 GB+694% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 7_0 (Radeon VE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | Radeon VE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1+16% | 7_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 draws 50W versus the Radeon VE's 295W — a 142% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 350W (Radeon VE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 165mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | Radeon VE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-83% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 165mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 came in at $49, while the Radeon VE launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon VE was 100+% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs Infinity (Radeon VE) — the Radeon VE offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon VE (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 | Radeon VE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | Broadway | Vega 20 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | February 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #846 | #125 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














