MOBILITY RADEON 9200 vs RADEON 9200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9200 vs RADEON 9200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

MOBILITY RADEON 9200 vs RADEON 9200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON 9200

2019

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅296.8% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 65 MB).
✅MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON 9200 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
102% HIGHER MSRP
$99 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON 9200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 256 MB vs 65 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

MOBILITY RADEON 9200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 51.5% (0.1 vs 0.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON 9200 has the stronger long-term case.

MOBILITY RADEON 9200 vs RADEON 9200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

RADEON 9200

The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 scores 3 versus the RADEON 9200's 4 — the RADEON 9200 leads by 33.3%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON 9200 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 384 (RADEON 9200). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9200	RADEON 9200
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 3.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	800+108%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS+42%	0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	40+67%	24
L1 Cache	80 KB	96 KB+20%
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9200	RADEON 9200
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 carries 256 MB. RADEON 9200 gives you 296.8% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9200. L2 Cache: 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 128 KB (RADEON 9200) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9200	RADEON 9200
VRAM Capacity	0.063 GB	0.25 GB+297%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 draws 50W versus the RADEON 9200's 50W — a 0% difference. The RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 350W (RADEON 9200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9200	RADEON 9200
TDP	50W	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 came in at $49, while the RADEON 9200 launched at $99. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON 9200 was 50.5% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) vs 0.0 (RADEON 9200) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9200 (2019 vs 2010).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9200	RADEON 9200
MSRP	$49-51%	$99
Performance per Dollar	0.1	0.0
Codename	Broadway	Polaris 24
Release	January 7 2010	May 13 2019
Ranking	#846	#898

Search MOBILITY RADEON 9200 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.