RADEON 7500 vs RADEON IGP 320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON 7500 vs RADEON IGP 320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON 7500 vs RADEON IGP 320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON 7500

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 300W, a 250W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
99% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

RADEON IGP 320

2021

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 165.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
✅RADEON 7500 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON IGP 320 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌500% higher power demand at 300W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON IGP 320 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON IGP 320 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 65 MB of VRAM, a 7nm process instead of 14nm, 72 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON IGP 320 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $99 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 165.3% (0.0 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

RADEON 7500 vs RADEON IGP 320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON 7500

The RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $79.

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 7500 scores 3 versus the RADEON IGP 320's 4 — the RADEON IGP 320 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON 7500 is built on GCN 4.0 while the RADEON IGP 320 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (RADEON 7500) vs 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON 7500) vs 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

Feature	RADEON 7500	RADEON IGP 320
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	512	4608+800%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.211 TFLOPS	20.28 TFLOPS+1575%
Boost Clock	1183 MHz	2200 MHz+86%
ROPs	16	128+700%
TMUs	32	288+800%
L1 Cache	0.13 MB	1 MB+669%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 7500	RADEON IGP 320
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 7500 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON IGP 320 carries 512 MB. RADEON IGP 320 gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the RADEON 7500 and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 320. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (RADEON 7500) vs 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON 7500	RADEON IGP 320
VRAM Capacity	0.063 GB	0.5 GB+694%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 7500 draws 50W versus the RADEON IGP 320's 300W — a 142.9% difference. The RADEON 7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 7500) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 320). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	RADEON 7500	RADEON IGP 320
TDP	50W-83%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON 7500 came in at $199, while the RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100. On MSRP, RADEON IGP 320 was 49.7% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (RADEON 7500) vs 0.0 (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is RADEON IGP 320 (2021 vs 2017).

Feature	RADEON 7500	RADEON IGP 320
MSRP	$199	$100-50%
Performance per Dollar	0.0	0.0
Codename	Lexa	Navi 21
Release	April 20 2017	November 4 2021
Ranking	#668	#136

Search RADEON 7500 on Amazon

Search RADEON IGP 320 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.