RADEON 7500
VS
RADEON IGP 320

RADEON 7500 vs RADEON IGP 320

AMD

RADEON 7500

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
VS
AMD

RADEON IGP 320

2021Core: 1825 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 7500 is positioned at rank 384 and the RADEON IGP 320 is on rank 424, so the RADEON 7500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 7500

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
362700%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
348450%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
344400%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
343800%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
343100%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
341150%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
336850%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
335600%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
332500%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
331600%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
327600%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
326900%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
321000%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
320800%
#364
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
400000%
#379
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
100%
#380
GeForce4 Ti 4800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
100%
#381
GeForce4 MX 460
MSRP: $179|Avg: $15
100%
#382
GeForce4 Ti 4600
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
100%
#383
GeForce4 Ti 4400
MSRP: $299|Avg: $49
100%
#384
RADEON 7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $50
100%
#385
GeForce3 Ti 500
MSRP: $349|Avg: $49
50%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 320

#409
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
369325%
#424
RADEON IGP 320
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#425
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
50%
#426
Quadro FX 2000
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40
25%
#427
GRID V100-8Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000
0%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON IGP 320 uses modern memory architecture. The RADEON IGP 320 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The RADEON 7500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON IGP 320 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score and 693.7% more VRAM (512 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 7500.

InsightRADEON 7500RADEON IGP 320
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)
Leading raw performance (+33.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+693.7%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON IGP 320 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $50 for the RADEON 7500, it costs 60% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 233.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRADEON 7500RADEON IGP 320
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+233.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
No prediction data available
Path of Exile 2
No prediction data available
Counter-Strike 2
No prediction data available
Counter-Strike 2
No prediction data available

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 7500 and RADEON IGP 320

AMD

RADEON 7500

The RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 7500 scores 3 versus the RADEON IGP 320's 4 — the RADEON IGP 320 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON 7500 is built on GCN 4.0 while the RADEON IGP 320 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (RADEON 7500) vs 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON 7500) vs 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

FeatureRADEON 7500RADEON IGP 320
G3D Mark Score
3
4+33%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
512
4608+800%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.211 TFLOPS
20.28 TFLOPS+1575%
Boost Clock
1183 MHz
2200 MHz+86%
ROPs
16
128+700%
TMUs
32
288+800%
L1 Cache
0.13 MB
1 MB+669%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
4 MB+1500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON 7500RADEON IGP 320
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 7500 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON IGP 320 has 512 MB. The RADEON IGP 320 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (RADEON 7500) vs 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRADEON 7500RADEON IGP 320
VRAM Capacity
0.063 GB
0.5 GB+694%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
4 MB+1500%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 7500 draws 50W versus the RADEON IGP 320's 300W — a 142.9% difference. The RADEON 7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 7500) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 320). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

FeatureRADEON 7500RADEON IGP 320
TDP
50W-83%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON 7500 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100 and now averages $20. The RADEON IGP 320 costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (RADEON 7500) vs 0.2 (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 offers 100% better value. The RADEON IGP 320 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).

FeatureRADEON 7500RADEON IGP 320
MSRP
$199
$100-50%
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$20-60%
Performance per Dollar
0.1
0.2+100%
Codename
Lexa
Navi 21
Release
April 20 2017
November 4 2021
Ranking
#668
#136