GeForce2 MX vs RADEON IGP 320

NVIDIA

GeForce2 MX

2022Core: 832 MHzBoost: 1155 MHz
VS
AMD

RADEON IGP 320

2021Core: 1825 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz

GeForce2 MX vs RADEON IGP 320 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce2 MX vs RADEON IGP 320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce2 MX vs RADEON IGP 320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce2 MX

2022

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 25W instead of 300W, a 275W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware, 65 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌
    29% HIGHER MSRP
    $129 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

RADEON IGP 320

2021

Why buy it

  • βœ…+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • βœ…Costs $29 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 72% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • βœ…693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌1100% higher power demand at 300W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON IGP 320 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce2 MX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2022 generation instead of 2021. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON IGP 320 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $29 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 72% (0.0 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON IGP 320 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce2 MX has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce2 MX vs RADEON IGP 320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce2 MX

The GeForce2 MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

AMD

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX scores 3 versus the RADEON IGP 320's 4 β€” the RADEON IGP 320 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX is built on Ampere while the RADEON IGP 320 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce2 MX) vs 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX) vs 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2200 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce2 MX) vs 72 (RADEON IGP 320) with 64 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce2 MXRADEON IGP 320
G3D Mark Score
3
4+33%
Architecture
Ampere
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
8 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
2048
4608+125%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.731 TFLOPS
20.28 TFLOPS+329%
Boost Clock
1155 MHz
2200 MHz+90%
ROPs
40
128+220%
TMUs
64
288+350%
L1 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores
16
72+350%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce2 MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON IGP 320 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce2 MXRADEON IGP 320
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce2 MX has 65 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON IGP 320 carries 512 MB. RADEON IGP 320 gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 320. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce2 MX) vs 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) β€” the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce2 MXRADEON IGP 320
VRAM Capacity
0.063 GB
0.5 GB+694%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX draws 25W versus the RADEON IGP 320's 300W β€” a 169.2% difference. The GeForce2 MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 320). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce2 MXRADEON IGP 320
TDP
25W-92%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
160mm
β€”
Height
111mm
β€”
Slots
1
β€”
Temp (Load)
60Β°C
β€”
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.0
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce2 MX came in at $129, while the RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100. On MSRP, RADEON IGP 320 was 22.5% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce2 MX) vs 0.0 (RADEON IGP 320) β€” the RADEON IGP 320 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce2 MX (2022 vs 2021).

FeatureGeForce2 MXRADEON IGP 320
MSRP
$129
$100-22%
Performance per Dollar
0.0
0.0
Codename
GA107
Navi 21
Release
Maio 2022
November 4 2021
Ranking
#407
#136

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.