GeForce2 MX vs RADEON IGP 320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce2 MX is positioned at rank 754 and the RADEON IGP 320 is on rank 424, so the RADEON IGP 320 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce2 MX

#744

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

542850%

#746

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

492100%

#747

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

490800%

#751

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

446300%

#752

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

443250%

#754

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

100%

#755

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

50%

#756

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

50%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 320

#409

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

369325%

#424

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

100%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

50%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

25%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON IGP 320 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score and 693.7% more VRAM (512 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce2 MX.

Insight	GeForce2 MX	RADEON IGP 320
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%)
Longevity	Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+693.7%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON IGP 320 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $49 for the GeForce2 MX, it costs 59% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 226.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce2 MX	RADEON IGP 320
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+226.7%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)	✅More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce2 MX Benchmark Check

RADEON IGP 320 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce2 MX and RADEON IGP 320

GeForce2 MX

The GeForce2 MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX scores 3 versus the RADEON IGP 320's 4 — the RADEON IGP 320 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX is built on Ampere while the RADEON IGP 320 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce2 MX) vs 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX) vs 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2200 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce2 MX) vs 72 (RADEON IGP 320) with 64 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce2 MX	RADEON IGP 320
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2048	4608+125%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS	20.28 TFLOPS+329%
Boost Clock	1155 MHz	2200 MHz+90%
ROPs	40	128+220%
TMUs	64	288+350%
L1 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores	16	72+350%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce2 MX	RADEON IGP 320
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce2 MX comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON IGP 320 has 512 MB. The RADEON IGP 320 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce2 MX) vs 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce2 MX	RADEON IGP 320
VRAM Capacity	0.063 GB	0.5 GB+694%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX draws 25W versus the RADEON IGP 320's 300W — a 169.2% difference. The GeForce2 MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 320). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce2 MX	RADEON IGP 320
TDP	25W-92%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	160mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	60°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce2 MX launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100 and now averages $20. The RADEON IGP 320 costs 59.2% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce2 MX) vs 0.2 (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 offers 100% better value. The GeForce2 MX is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).