
GeForce2 MX

RADEON IGP 320
GeForce2 MX vs RADEON IGP 320 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce2 MX vs RADEON IGP 320 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce2 MX vs RADEON IGP 320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce2 MX
2022Why buy it
- β Draws 25W instead of 300W, a 275W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
- βLess VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βOlder hardware, 65 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- β29% HIGHER MSRP$129 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
RADEON IGP 320
2021Why buy it
- β +33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Costs $29 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- β Delivers 72% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- β 693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
Trade-offs
- βOlder hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- β1100% higher power demand at 300W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce2 MX vs RADEON IGP 320 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX
The GeForce2 MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

RADEON IGP 320
The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX scores 3 versus the RADEON IGP 320's 4 β the RADEON IGP 320 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX is built on Ampere while the RADEON IGP 320 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce2 MX) vs 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX) vs 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2200 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce2 MX) vs 72 (RADEON IGP 320) with 64 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 4+33% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 4608+125% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 20.28 TFLOPS+329% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 2200 MHz+90% |
| ROPs | 40 | 128+220% |
| TMUs | 64 | 288+350% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 72+350% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce2 MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON IGP 320 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce2 MX has 65 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON IGP 320 carries 512 MB. RADEON IGP 320 gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 320. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce2 MX) vs 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) β the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.5 GB+694% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce2 MX draws 25W versus the RADEON IGP 320's 300W β a 169.2% difference. The GeForce2 MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 320). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-92% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 160mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 60Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce2 MX came in at $129, while the RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100. On MSRP, RADEON IGP 320 was 22.5% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce2 MX) vs 0.0 (RADEON IGP 320) β the RADEON IGP 320 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce2 MX (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $100-22% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 21 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | November 4 2021 |
| Ranking | #407 | #136 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














