
GeForce2 MX

GeForce2 MX/MX 400
GeForce2 MX vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce2 MX vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce2 MX vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce2 MX
2022Why buy it
- ✅GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce2 MX is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 65 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
2020Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 33.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce2 MX vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX
The GeForce2 MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX scores 3 versus the GeForce2 MX/MX 400's 4 — the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX is built on Ampere while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce2 MX) vs 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 4+33% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+129% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+47% | 3.226 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1575 MHz+36% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce2 MX has 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 carries 512 MB. GeForce2 MX/MX 400 gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX and 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX/MX 400.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.5 GB+694% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX) vs 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX) vs None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Decoder | MPEG-2 Decoder |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce2 MX draws 25W versus the GeForce2 MX/MX 400's 25W — a 0% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX) vs 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 55°C.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 25W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | 55°C-8% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.2+100% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce2 MX came in at $129, while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 launched at $129. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce2 MX) vs 0.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) — the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce2 MX (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $129 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #407 | #523 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














