
GeForce2 MX

RADEON 9200
GeForce2 MX vs RADEON 9200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce2 MX vs RADEON 9200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone

Euro Truck Simulator 2
GeForce2 MX vs RADEON 9200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce2 MX
2022Why buy it
- ✅RADEON 9200 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce2 MX is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 50W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 65 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌30.3% HIGHER MSRP$129 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
RADEON 9200
2019Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 73.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅296.8% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 65 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 50W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce2 MX vs RADEON 9200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX
The GeForce2 MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

RADEON 9200
The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX scores 3 versus the RADEON 9200's 4 — the RADEON 9200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX is built on Ampere while the RADEON 9200 uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce2 MX) vs 384 (RADEON 9200). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 4+33% |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+502% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz+13% | 1024 MHz |
| ROPs | 40+400% | 8 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+2122% | 0.09 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+1438% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce2 MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce2 MX has 65 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 carries 256 MB. RADEON 9200 gives you 296.8% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX and 64-bit on the RADEON 9200. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce2 MX) vs 0.13 MB (RADEON 9200) — the GeForce2 MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.25 GB+297% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+1438% | 0.13 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce2 MX draws 25W versus the RADEON 9200's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce2 MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX) vs 350W (RADEON 9200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-50% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce2 MX came in at $129, while the RADEON 9200 launched at $99. On MSRP, RADEON 9200 was 23.3% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce2 MX) vs 0.0 (RADEON 9200) — the RADEON 9200 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce2 MX (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $99-23% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #407 | #898 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














