GeForce2 MX vs RADEON 9200

NVIDIA

GeForce2 MX

2022Core: 832 MHzBoost: 1155 MHz
Similar parts
·····
VS
AMD

RADEON 9200

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce2 MX vs RADEON 9200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce2 MX vs RADEON 9200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce2 MX vs RADEON 9200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce2 MX

2022

Why buy it

  • RADEON 9200 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce2 MX is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 25W instead of 50W, a 25W reduction.
  • More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
  • Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 65 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 30.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $129 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

RADEON 9200

2019

Why buy it

  • +33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $30 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • Delivers 73.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • 296.8% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 65 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 100% higher power demand at 50W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON 9200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce2 MX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON 9200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 73.7% (0.0 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON 9200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce2 MX has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce2 MX vs RADEON 9200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce2 MX

The GeForce2 MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

AMD

RADEON 9200

The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX scores 3 versus the RADEON 9200's 4 — the RADEON 9200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX is built on Ampere while the RADEON 9200 uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce2 MX) vs 384 (RADEON 9200). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

FeatureGeForce2 MXRADEON 9200
G3D Mark Score
3
4+33%
Architecture
Ampere
GCN 3.0
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048+433%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.731 TFLOPS+502%
0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1155 MHz+13%
1024 MHz
ROPs
40+400%
8
TMUs
64+167%
24
L1 Cache
2 MB+2122%
0.09 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+1438%
0.13 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce2 MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce2 MXRADEON 9200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce2 MX has 65 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 carries 256 MB. RADEON 9200 gives you 296.8% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX and 64-bit on the RADEON 9200. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce2 MX) vs 0.13 MB (RADEON 9200) — the GeForce2 MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce2 MXRADEON 9200
VRAM Capacity
0.063 GB
0.25 GB+297%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+1438%
0.13 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX draws 25W versus the RADEON 9200's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce2 MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX) vs 350W (RADEON 9200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce2 MXRADEON 9200
TDP
25W-50%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
160mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
60°C
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce2 MX came in at $129, while the RADEON 9200 launched at $99. On MSRP, RADEON 9200 was 23.3% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce2 MX) vs 0.0 (RADEON 9200) — the RADEON 9200 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce2 MX (2022 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce2 MXRADEON 9200
MSRP
$129
$99-23%
Performance per Dollar
0.0
0.0
Codename
GA107
Polaris 24
Release
Maio 2022
May 13 2019
Ranking
#407
#898

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.