GeForce2 MX vs RADEON 9200
GeForce2 MX
Popular choices:
RADEON 9200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce2 MX is positioned at rank 754 and the RADEON 9200 is on rank 748, so the RADEON 9200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce2 MX
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score and 296.8% more VRAM (256 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce2 MX.
| Insight | GeForce2 MX | RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+296.8%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON 9200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $49 for the GeForce2 MX, it costs 49% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 161.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce2 MX | RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+161.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce2 MX and RADEON 9200
GeForce2 MX
The GeForce2 MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
RADEON 9200
The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX scores 3 versus the RADEON 9200's 4 — the RADEON 9200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX is built on Ampere while the RADEON 9200 uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce2 MX) vs 384 (RADEON 9200). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 4+33% |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+502% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz+13% | 1024 MHz |
| ROPs | 40+400% | 8 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+2122% | 0.09 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+1438% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce2 MX comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 has 256 MB. The RADEON 9200 offers 296.8% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce2 MX) vs 0.13 MB (RADEON 9200) — the GeForce2 MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.25 GB+297% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+1438% | 0.13 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce2 MX draws 25W versus the RADEON 9200's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce2 MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX) vs 350W (RADEON 9200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-50% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce2 MX launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON 9200 launched at $99 and now averages $25. The RADEON 9200 costs 49% less ($24 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce2 MX) vs 0.2 (RADEON 9200) — the RADEON 9200 offers 100% better value. The GeForce2 MX is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $99-23% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $25-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.2+100% |
| Codename | GA107 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #407 | #898 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce2 MX and RADEON 9200
