GeForce2 MX vs Radeon IGP 320M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce2 MX vs Radeon IGP 320M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce2 MX vs Radeon IGP 320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce2 MX

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 85W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 65 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon IGP 320M

2019

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
❌240% higher power demand at 85W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon IGP 320M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce2 MX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce2 MX makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon IGP 320M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce2 MX vs Radeon IGP 320M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX

The GeForce2 MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

Radeon IGP 320M

The Radeon IGP 320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX scores 3 versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 4 — the Radeon IGP 320M leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX is built on Ampere while the Radeon IGP 320M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce2 MX) vs 1,280 (Radeon IGP 320M). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 320M). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

Feature	GeForce2 MX	Radeon IGP 320M
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2048+60%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS+48%	3.2 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1155 MHz	1250 MHz+8%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	64	80+25%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce2 MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon IGP 320M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce2 MX	Radeon IGP 320M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce2 MX has 65 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon IGP 320M carries 512 MB. Radeon IGP 320M gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX and 64-bit on the Radeon IGP 320M.

Feature	GeForce2 MX	Radeon IGP 320M
VRAM Capacity	0.063 GB	0.5 GB+694%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce2 MX	Radeon IGP 320M
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX) vs None (Radeon IGP 320M). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon IGP 320M).

Feature	GeForce2 MX	Radeon IGP 320M
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	MPEG-2 Decoder	None
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX draws 25W versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 85W — a 109.1% difference. The GeForce2 MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 320M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce2 MX	Radeon IGP 320M
TDP	25W-71%	85W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	60°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce2 MX (2022 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce2 MX	Radeon IGP 320M
MSRP	$129	—
Codename	GA107	Navi 14
Release	Maio 2022	November 13 2019
Ranking	#407	#403

Search GeForce2 MX on Amazon

Search Radeon IGP 320M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.