
GeForce2 MX vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500

GeForce2 MX
Popular choices:

MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce2 MX is positioned at rank 754 and the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is on rank 744, so the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce2 MX
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce2 MX is significantly newer (2022 vs 2010). The GeForce2 MX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce2 MX.
| Insight | GeForce2 MX | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the GeForce2 MX, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 335.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce2 MX | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+335.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce2 MX and MOBILITY RADEON 7500

GeForce2 MX
The GeForce2 MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

MOBILITY RADEON 7500
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX scores 3 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 4 — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX is built on Ampere while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 uses TeraScale 2, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce2 MX) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7500).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 4+33% |
| Architecture | Ampere | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+156% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+322% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+2400% | 0.08 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 65 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce2 MX) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) — the GeForce2 MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX) vs 7.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce2 MX draws 25W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce2 MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-50% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-14% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce2 MX launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 launched at $49 and now averages $15. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce2 MX) vs 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers 200% better value. The GeForce2 MX is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $49-62% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $15-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.3+200% |
| Codename | GA107 | Broadway |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #407 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















