
GeForce2 MX

MOBILITY RADEON 7500
GeForce2 MX vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce2 MX vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce2 MX vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce2 MX
2022Why buy it
- ✅MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce2 MX is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 50W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
- ❌Older hardware, 65 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌163.3% HIGHER MSRP$129 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
2010Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 251% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 50W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce2 MX vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX
The GeForce2 MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

MOBILITY RADEON 7500
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX scores 3 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 4 — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX is built on Ampere while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 uses TeraScale 2, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce2 MX) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7500).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 4+33% |
| Architecture | Ampere | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+156% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+322% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+2400% | 0.08 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce2 MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 65 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 7500. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce2 MX) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) — the GeForce2 MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX) vs 7.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce2 MX draws 25W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce2 MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-50% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-14% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce2 MX came in at $129, while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 launched at $49. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON 7500 was 62% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce2 MX) vs 0.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce2 MX (2022 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $49-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Codename | GA107 | Broadway |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #407 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














