GeForce2 MX vs RADEON 9000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce2 MX vs RADEON 9000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce2 MX vs RADEON 9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce2 MX

2022

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 5).
❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 128 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 65 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
163.3% HIGHER MSRP
$129 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

RADEON 9000

2024

Why buy it

✅+66.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅Delivers 338.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅98.4% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (128 MB vs 65 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON 9000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 66.7% in PassMark G3D (5 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 128 MB vs 65 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 8nm, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2022. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $80 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 338.8% (0.1 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce2 MX vs RADEON 9000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX

The GeForce2 MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX scores 3 versus the RADEON 9000's 5 — the RADEON 9000 leads by 66.7%. The GeForce2 MX is built on Ampere while the RADEON 9000 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce2 MX) vs 1,024 (RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce2 MX) vs 16 (RADEON 9000) with 64 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce2 MX	RADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score	3	5+67%
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	8 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	2048+100%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS	5.939 TFLOPS+26%
Boost Clock	1155 MHz	2900 MHz+151%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	64	64
L1 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	16	16

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce2 MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce2 MX	RADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce2 MX has 65 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9000 carries 128 MB. RADEON 9000 gives you 98.4% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX and 64-bit on the RADEON 9000.

Feature	GeForce2 MX	RADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity	0.063 GB	0.125 GB+98%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX draws 25W versus the RADEON 9000's 15W — a 50% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX) vs 350W (RADEON 9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce2 MX	RADEON 9000
TDP	25W	15W-40%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	160mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	60°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.3+200%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce2 MX came in at $129, while the RADEON 9000 launched at $49. On MSRP, RADEON 9000 was 62% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce2 MX) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9000) — the RADEON 9000 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9000 (2024 vs 2022).

Feature	GeForce2 MX	RADEON 9000
MSRP	$129	$49-62%
Performance per Dollar	0.0	0.1
Codename	GA107	Strix Point
Release	Maio 2022	July 15 2024
Ranking	#407	#312

Search GeForce2 MX on Amazon

Search RADEON 9000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.