RADEON 9000 vs RADEON IGP 320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9000 is positioned at rank 742 and the RADEON IGP 320 is on rank 424, so the RADEON IGP 320 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9000

#731

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

108570%

#733

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

98420%

#734

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

98160%

#738

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

89260%

#739

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

88650%

#741

RADEON 9200 SE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $15

100%

#742

RADEON 9000

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

100%

#743

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

80%

#744

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

60%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

60%

#746

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

50%

#747

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

40%

#748

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

40%

#749

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

30%

#750

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

30%

#751

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

30%

#752

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

30%

#753

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

20%

#754

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

10%

#755

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

10%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 320

#409

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

369325%

#424

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

100%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

50%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

25%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON 9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON IGP 320 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	RADEON 9000	RADEON IGP 320
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+25%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-25%)
Longevity	RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON 9000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $20 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 25% better value per dollar than the RADEON IGP 320.

Insight	RADEON 9000	RADEON IGP 320
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+25%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON 9000 Benchmark Check

RADEON IGP 320 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9000 and RADEON IGP 320

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9000 scores 5 versus the RADEON IGP 320's 4 — the RADEON 9000 leads by 25%. The RADEON 9000 is built on RDNA 3.5 while the RADEON IGP 320 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (RADEON 9000) vs 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000) vs 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2200 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (RADEON 9000) vs 72 (RADEON IGP 320).

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON IGP 320
G3D Mark Score	5+25%	4
Architecture	RDNA 3.5	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	4 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1024	4608+350%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.939 TFLOPS	20.28 TFLOPS+241%
Boost Clock	2900 MHz+32%	2200 MHz
ROPs	32	128+300%
TMUs	64	288+350%
L1 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores	16	72+350%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON IGP 320
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9000 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON IGP 320 has 512 MB. The RADEON IGP 320 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON 9000) vs 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON IGP 320
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9000 draws 15W versus the RADEON IGP 320's 300W — a 181% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9000) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 320). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON IGP 320
TDP	15W-95%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Perf/Watt	0.3	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON 9000 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100 and now averages $20. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (RADEON 9000) vs 0.2 (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON 9000 offers 50% better value. The RADEON 9000 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).