RADEON 9000 vs RADEON IGP 320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON 9000 vs RADEON IGP 320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON 9000 vs RADEON IGP 320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON 9000

2024

Why buy it

✅+25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 155.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

RADEON IGP 320

2021

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 5).
❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
104.1% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON 9000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 25% in PassMark G3D (5 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 7nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2021. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 155.1% (0.1 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

RADEON 9000 vs RADEON IGP 320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9000 scores 5 versus the RADEON IGP 320's 4 — the RADEON 9000 leads by 25%. The RADEON 9000 is built on RDNA 3.5 while the RADEON IGP 320 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (RADEON 9000) vs 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000) vs 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2200 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (RADEON 9000) vs 72 (RADEON IGP 320).

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON IGP 320
G3D Mark Score	5+25%	4
Architecture	RDNA 3.5	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	4 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1024	4608+350%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.939 TFLOPS	20.28 TFLOPS+241%
Boost Clock	2900 MHz+32%	2200 MHz
ROPs	32	128+300%
TMUs	64	288+350%
L1 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores	16	72+350%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON IGP 320
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9000 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON IGP 320 carries 512 MB. RADEON IGP 320 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON 9000 and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 320. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON 9000) vs 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON IGP 320
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9000 draws 15W versus the RADEON IGP 320's 300W — a 181% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9000) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 320). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON IGP 320
TDP	15W-95%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Perf/Watt	0.3	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON 9000 came in at $49, while the RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100. On MSRP, RADEON 9000 was 51% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (RADEON 9000) vs 0.0 (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON 9000 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9000 (2024 vs 2021).

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON IGP 320
MSRP	$49-51%	$100
Performance per Dollar	0.1	0.0
Codename	Strix Point	Navi 21
Release	July 15 2024	November 4 2021
Ranking	#312	#136

Search RADEON 9000 on Amazon

Search RADEON IGP 320 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.