GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs RADEON 9000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs RADEON 9000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs RADEON 9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

2012

Why buy it

✅+20% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌113.3% higher power demand at 32W vs 15W.

RADEON 9000

2024

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 32W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 6).
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 440 Go 64M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 20% in PassMark G3D (6 vs 5), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce4 440 Go 64M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs RADEON 9000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 440 Go 64M scores 6 versus the RADEON 9000's 5 — the GeForce4 440 Go 64M leads by 20%. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is built on Kepler while the RADEON 9000 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 1,024 (RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000).

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	RADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score	6+20%	5
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	384	1024+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5445 TFLOPS	5.939 TFLOPS+991%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	64+100%
L1 Cache	32 KB	256 KB+700%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	RADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9000 carries 128 MB. GeForce4 440 Go 64M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 440 Go 64M and 64-bit on the RADEON 9000. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 2 MB (RADEON 9000) — the RADEON 9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	RADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M draws 32W versus the RADEON 9000's 15W — a 72.3% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 350W (RADEON 9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	RADEON 9000
TDP	32W	15W-53%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.3+50%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON 9000 (2024 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	RADEON 9000
MSRP	—	$49
Codename	GK107	Strix Point
Release	October 1 2012	July 15 2024
Ranking	#903	#312

Search GeForce4 440 Go 64M on Amazon

Search RADEON 9000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.