GeForce FX 5200LE vs RADEON 9000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5200LE vs RADEON 9000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5200LE vs RADEON 9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5200LE

2025

Why buy it

✅+40% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $6 less on MSRP ($43 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
✅Delivers 59.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($43 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌3733.3% higher power demand at 575W vs 15W.

RADEON 9000

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 575W, a 560W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 7).
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
14% HIGHER MSRP
$49 MSRPvs$43 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $43 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce FX 5200LE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 40% in PassMark G3D (7 vs 5), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce FX 5200LE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, 170 vs 16 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2024. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce FX 5200LE makes the most sense to buy today. It is $6 cheaper on MSRP at $43 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 59.5% (0.2 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce FX 5200LE vs RADEON 9000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5200LE

The GeForce FX 5200LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,999.

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200LE scores 7 versus the RADEON 9000's 5 — the GeForce FX 5200LE leads by 40%. The GeForce FX 5200LE is built on Rankine while the RADEON 9000 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 1,024 (RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 16 (RADEON 9000) with 680 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce FX 5200LE	RADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score	7+40%	5
Architecture	Rankine	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	5 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	21760+2025%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	104.8 TFLOPS+1665%	5.939 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2407 MHz	2900 MHz+20%
ROPs	176+450%	32
TMUs	680+963%	64
L1 Cache	21.3 MB+8420%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	96 MB+4700%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	170+963%	16

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5200LE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce FX 5200LE	RADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5200LE has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9000 carries 128 MB. GeForce FX 5200LE gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200LE and 64-bit on the RADEON 9000. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 2 MB (RADEON 9000) — the GeForce FX 5200LE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5200LE	RADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	96 MB+4700%	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5200LE draws 575W versus the RADEON 9000's 15W — a 189.8% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 350W (RADEON 9000). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce FX 5200LE	RADEON 9000
TDP	575W	15W-97%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5200LE came in at $43, while the RADEON 9000 launched at $49. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5200LE was 12.2% cheaper ($6 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9000) — the GeForce FX 5200LE offers 100% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5200LE (2025 vs 2024).

Feature	GeForce FX 5200LE	RADEON 9000
MSRP	$43-12%	$49
Performance per Dollar	0.2+100%	0.1
Codename	GB202	Strix Point
Release	January 30 2025	July 15 2024
Ranking	#3	#312

Search GeForce FX 5200LE on Amazon

Search RADEON 9000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.