RADEON 9000 vs Radeon IGP 320M

AMD

RADEON 9000

2024Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
AMD

Radeon IGP 320M

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1250 MHz
Similar parts
······

RADEON 9000 vs Radeon IGP 320M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON 9000 vs Radeon IGP 320M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON 9000 vs Radeon IGP 320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON 9000

2024

Why buy it

  • +25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon IGP 320M

2019

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 5).
  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON 9000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 25% in PassMark G3D (5 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON 9000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 7nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON 9000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

RADEON 9000 vs Radeon IGP 320M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

AMD

Radeon IGP 320M

The Radeon IGP 320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9000 scores 5 versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 4 — the RADEON 9000 leads by 25%. The RADEON 9000 is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon IGP 320M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (RADEON 9000) vs 1,280 (Radeon IGP 320M). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 320M). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

FeatureRADEON 9000Radeon IGP 320M
G3D Mark Score
5+25%
4
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
4 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1024
1280+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.939 TFLOPS+86%
3.2 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2900 MHz+132%
1250 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
80+25%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON 9000Radeon IGP 320M
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9000 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon IGP 320M carries 512 MB. Radeon IGP 320M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON 9000 and 64-bit on the Radeon IGP 320M.

FeatureRADEON 9000Radeon IGP 320M
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9000 draws 15W versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 85W — a 140% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9000) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 320M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRADEON 9000Radeon IGP 320M
TDP
15W-82%
85W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
0.3
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON 9000 (2024 vs 2019).

FeatureRADEON 9000Radeon IGP 320M
MSRP
$49
Codename
Strix Point
Navi 14
Release
July 15 2024
November 13 2019
Ranking
#312
#403

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.