
RADEON 9000 vs Radeon IGP 320M

RADEON 9000
Popular choices:

Radeon IGP 320M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9000 is positioned at rank 742 and the Radeon IGP 320M is on rank 412, so the Radeon IGP 320M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon IGP 320M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon IGP 320M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON 9000 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+25%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-25%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON 9000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9000 and Radeon IGP 320M

RADEON 9000
The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

Radeon IGP 320M
The Radeon IGP 320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9000 scores 5 versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 4 — the RADEON 9000 leads by 25%. The RADEON 9000 is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon IGP 320M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (RADEON 9000) vs 1,280 (Radeon IGP 320M). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 320M). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5+25% | 4 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1280+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.939 TFLOPS+86% | 3.2 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+132% | 1250 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9000 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon IGP 320M has 512 MB. The Radeon IGP 320M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9000 draws 15W versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 85W — a 140% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9000) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 320M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-82% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9000 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Codename | Strix Point | Navi 14 |
| Release | July 15 2024 | November 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #312 | #403 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















