GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs RADEON IGP 320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs RADEON IGP 320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs RADEON IGP 320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 300W, a 290W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

RADEON IGP 320

2021

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅GeForce2 MX 100/200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON IGP 320 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌2900% higher power demand at 300W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON IGP 320 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON IGP 320 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 14nm, 72 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON IGP 320 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs RADEON IGP 320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 scores 3 versus the RADEON IGP 320's 4 — the RADEON IGP 320 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is built on Pascal while the RADEON IGP 320 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON IGP 320
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	4608+1100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	20.28 TFLOPS+2444%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	2200 MHz+112%
ROPs	16	128+700%
TMUs	24	288+1100%
L1 Cache	0.14 MB	1 MB+614%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON IGP 320 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON IGP 320
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX 100/200 and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 320. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON IGP 320
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 draws 10W versus the RADEON IGP 320's 300W — a 187.1% difference. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 320). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON IGP 320
TDP	10W-97%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	165mm	—
Height	64mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	55	—
Perf/Watt	0.3	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 came in at $0, while the RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX 100/200 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 0.0 (RADEON IGP 320) — the GeForce2 MX 100/200 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON IGP 320 (2021 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON IGP 320
MSRP	$0-100%	$100
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.0
Codename	GP108	Navi 21
Release	May 17 2017	November 4 2021
Ranking	#657	#136

Search GeForce2 MX 100/200 on Amazon

Search RADEON IGP 320 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.