G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs GeForce3 Ti 200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs GeForce3 Ti 200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 215W, a 205W reduction.
✅Measures 165mm instead of 183mm, a 18mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce3 Ti 200

2018

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅GeForce2 MX 100/200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce3 Ti 200 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌2050% higher power demand at 215W vs 10W.
❌10.9% longer card at 183mm vs 165mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce3 Ti 200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce3 Ti 200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 14nm, 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce3 Ti 200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs GeForce3 Ti 200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

GeForce3 Ti 200

The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 scores 3 versus the GeForce3 Ti 200's 4 — the GeForce3 Ti 200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is built on Pascal while the GeForce3 Ti 200 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1710 MHz.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	GeForce3 Ti 200
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	14 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	384	2944+667%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	10.07 TFLOPS+1163%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	1710 MHz+65%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	24	184+667%
L1 Cache	0.14 MB	2.9 MB+1971%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	GeForce3 Ti 200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX 100/200 and 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 200. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 4 MB (GeForce3 Ti 200) — the GeForce3 Ti 200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	GeForce3 Ti 200
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	GeForce3 Ti 200
DirectX	7.0	8.1+16%
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
OpenGL	1.2	1.3+8%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs None (GeForce3 Ti 200). Decoder: None vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 200).

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	GeForce3 Ti 200
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	None	None
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 draws 10W versus the GeForce3 Ti 200's 215W — a 182.2% difference. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 183mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 55 vs 60.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	GeForce3 Ti 200
TDP	10W-95%	215W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	165mm	183mm
Height	64mm	100mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	55-8%	60
Perf/Watt	0.3	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 came in at $0, while the GeForce3 Ti 200 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX 100/200 was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 200) — the GeForce2 MX 100/200 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce3 Ti 200 (2018 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	GeForce3 Ti 200
MSRP	$0-100%	$149
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.0
Codename	GP108	TU104
Release	May 17 2017	September 20 2018
Ranking	#657	#94

Search GeForce2 MX 100/200 on Amazon

Search GeForce3 Ti 200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.