GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs RADEON 9200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs RADEON 9200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs RADEON 9200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

2017

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 10W instead of 50W, a 40W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

RADEON 9200

2019

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅GeForce2 MX 100/200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON 9200 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌400% higher power demand at 50W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON 9200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs RADEON 9200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

RADEON 9200

The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 scores 3 versus the RADEON 9200's 4 — the RADEON 9200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is built on Pascal while the RADEON 9200 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 384 (RADEON 9200). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON 9200
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 3.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS+1%	0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1038 MHz+1%	1024 MHz
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	144 KB+50%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON 9200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 carries 256 MB. GeForce2 MX 100/200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX 100/200 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9200. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 128 KB (RADEON 9200) — the GeForce2 MX 100/200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON 9200
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 draws 10W versus the RADEON 9200's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 350W (RADEON 9200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON 9200
TDP	10W-80%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	165mm	—
Height	64mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	55	—
Perf/Watt	0.3+200%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 came in at $0, while the RADEON 9200 launched at $99. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX 100/200 was 100+% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 0.0 (RADEON 9200) — the GeForce2 MX 100/200 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9200 (2019 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON 9200
MSRP	$0-100%	$99
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.0
Codename	GP108	Polaris 24
Release	May 17 2017	May 13 2019
Ranking	#657	#898

Search GeForce2 MX 100/200 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.