GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs RADEON 9200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9200

#737

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

271425%

#739

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

246050%

#740

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

245400%

#744

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

223150%

#745

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

221625%

#747

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

100%

#748

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

100%

#749

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

75%

#750

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

75%

#751

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

75%

#752

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

75%

#753

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

50%

#754

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

25%

#755

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

25%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON 9200 uses modern memory architecture. The RADEON 9200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON 9200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON 9200
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON 9200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $49 for the GeForce2 MX 100/200, it costs 49% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 161.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON 9200
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+161.3%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)	✅More affordable ($25)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 Benchmark Check

RADEON 9200 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce2 MX 100/200 and RADEON 9200

GeForce2 MX 100/200

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

RADEON 9200

The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 scores 3 versus the RADEON 9200's 4 — the RADEON 9200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is built on Pascal while the RADEON 9200 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 384 (RADEON 9200). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON 9200
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 3.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS+1%	0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1038 MHz+1%	1024 MHz
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	144 KB+50%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON 9200
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 has 256 MB. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 128 KB (RADEON 9200) — the GeForce2 MX 100/200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON 9200
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 draws 10W versus the RADEON 9200's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 350W (RADEON 9200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON 9200
TDP	10W-80%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	165mm	—
Height	64mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	55	—
Perf/Watt	0.3+200%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON 9200 launched at $99 and now averages $25. The RADEON 9200 costs 49% less ($24 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 0.2 (RADEON 9200) — the RADEON 9200 offers 100% better value. The RADEON 9200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).