GeForce2 MX 100/200
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce2 MX 100/200
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
2010Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce2 MX 100/200
The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 scores 3 versus the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000's 4 — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is built on Pascal while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX 100/200 | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 4+33% |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+40% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB+80% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce2 MX 100/200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX 100/200 | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX 100/200 and 64-bit on the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) — the GeForce2 MX 100/200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX 100/200 | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX 100/200 | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.1+16% |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs N/A (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Decoder: None vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs MPEG-2 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX 100/200 | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | N/A |
| Decoder | None | MPEG-2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce2 MX 100/200 draws 10W versus the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000's 10W — a 0% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 165mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 55 vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX 100/200 | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W | 10W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 165mm | 0mm |
| Height | 64mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 55-21% | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 0.4+33% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 came in at $0, while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs Infinity (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is GeForce2 MX 100/200 (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX 100/200 | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | GP108 | Broadway |
| Release | May 17 2017 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #657 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce2 MX 100/200 and MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
