GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs RADEON 9000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs RADEON 9000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs RADEON 9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

2017

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 10W instead of 15W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 5).
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

RADEON 9000

2024

Why buy it

✅+66.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌50% higher power demand at 15W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON 9000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 66.7% in PassMark G3D (5 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 14nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs RADEON 9000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 scores 3 versus the RADEON 9000's 5 — the RADEON 9000 leads by 66.7%. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is built on Pascal while the RADEON 9000 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 1,024 (RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score	3	5+67%
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	14 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	384	1024+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	5.939 TFLOPS+645%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	2900 MHz+179%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	64+167%
L1 Cache	144 KB	256 KB+78%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9000 carries 128 MB. GeForce2 MX 100/200 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX 100/200 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9000. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 2 MB (RADEON 9000) — the RADEON 9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 draws 10W versus the RADEON 9000's 15W — a 40% difference. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 350W (RADEON 9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON 9000
TDP	10W-33%	15W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	165mm	—
Height	64mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	55	—
Perf/Watt	0.3	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 came in at $0, while the RADEON 9000 launched at $49. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX 100/200 was 100+% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9000) — the GeForce2 MX 100/200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9000 (2024 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	RADEON 9000
MSRP	$0-100%	$49
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.1
Codename	GP108	Strix Point
Release	May 17 2017	July 15 2024
Ranking	#657	#312

Search GeForce2 MX 100/200 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.