GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs Radeon IGP 320M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs Radeon IGP 320M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs Radeon IGP 320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 85W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon IGP 320M

2019

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅GeForce2 MX 100/200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon IGP 320M is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌750% higher power demand at 85W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon IGP 320M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon IGP 320M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 14nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon IGP 320M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs Radeon IGP 320M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

Radeon IGP 320M

The Radeon IGP 320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 scores 3 versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 4 — the Radeon IGP 320M leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon IGP 320M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 1,280 (Radeon IGP 320M). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 320M). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	Radeon IGP 320M
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	3.2 TFLOPS+301%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	1250 MHz+20%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon IGP 320M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	Radeon IGP 320M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX 100/200 and 64-bit on the Radeon IGP 320M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 2 MB (Radeon IGP 320M) — the Radeon IGP 320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	Radeon IGP 320M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	Radeon IGP 320M
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs None (Radeon IGP 320M). Decoder: None vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon IGP 320M).

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	Radeon IGP 320M
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	None	None
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 draws 10W versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 85W — a 157.9% difference. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 320M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	Radeon IGP 320M
TDP	10W-88%	85W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	165mm	—
Height	64mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	55	—
Perf/Watt	0.3	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon IGP 320M (2019 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	Radeon IGP 320M
MSRP	$0	—
Codename	GP108	Navi 14
Release	May 17 2017	November 13 2019
Ranking	#657	#403

Search GeForce2 MX 100/200 on Amazon

Search Radeon IGP 320M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.