GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

2017

Why buy it

✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
✅Draws 10W instead of 50W, a 40W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

2010

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌400% higher power demand at 50W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce2 MX 100/200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 65 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

MOBILITY RADEON 7500 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce2 MX 100/200 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 scores 3 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 4 — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is built on Pascal while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7500).

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	MOBILITY RADEON 7500
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	Pascal	TeraScale 2
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS+40%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	144 KB+80%	80 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 carries 65 MB. GeForce2 MX 100/200 gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX 100/200 and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 7500. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) — the GeForce2 MX 100/200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	MOBILITY RADEON 7500
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+694%	0.063 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 7.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	MOBILITY RADEON 7500
DirectX	7.0	7.0
OpenGL	1.2	1.3+8%
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 draws 10W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 55 vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	MOBILITY RADEON 7500
TDP	10W-80%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	165mm	—
Height	64mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	55-21%	70°C
Perf/Watt	0.3+200%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 came in at $0, while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 launched at $49. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX 100/200 was 100+% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 0.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) — the GeForce2 MX 100/200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce2 MX 100/200 (2017 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP	$0-100%	$49
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.1
Codename	GP108	Broadway
Release	May 17 2017	January 7 2010
Ranking	#657	#846

Search GeForce2 MX 100/200 on Amazon

Search MOBILITY RADEON 7500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.