GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs GeForce4 MX 460

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs GeForce4 MX 460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs GeForce4 MX 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

2017

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 10W instead of 160W, a 150W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $179 MSRP).

GeForce4 MX 460

2010

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌1500% higher power demand at 160W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 MX 460 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce2 MX 100/200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce4 MX 460 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce4 MX 460 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce2 MX 100/200 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce2 MX 100/200 vs GeForce4 MX 460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

GeForce4 MX 460

The GeForce4 MX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 scores 3 versus the GeForce4 MX 460's 4 — the GeForce4 MX 460 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is built on Pascal while the GeForce4 MX 460 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 336 (GeForce4 MX 460). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 460).

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	GeForce4 MX 460
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	Pascal	Fermi
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384+14%	336
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	0.9072 TFLOPS+14%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	56+133%
L1 Cache	144 KB	448 KB+211%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	GeForce4 MX 460
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 460 carries 128 MB. GeForce2 MX 100/200 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX 100/200 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 460.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	GeForce4 MX 460
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 460). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	GeForce4 MX 460
DirectX	7.0	7.0
Vulkan	N/A	None
OpenGL	1.2	1.3+8%
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs No (GeForce4 MX 460). Decoder: None vs No.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	GeForce4 MX 460
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	None	No
Codecs	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 draws 10W versus the GeForce4 MX 460's 160W — a 176.5% difference. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 165mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 55 vs 60°C.

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	GeForce4 MX 460
TDP	10W-94%	160W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	165mm	165mm
Height	64mm	100mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	55-8%	60°C
Perf/Watt	0.3	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 came in at $0, while the GeForce4 MX 460 launched at $179. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX 100/200 was 100+% cheaper ($179 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 MX 460) — the GeForce2 MX 100/200 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce2 MX 100/200 (2017 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce2 MX 100/200	GeForce4 MX 460
MSRP	$0-100%	$179
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.0
Codename	GP108	GF104
Release	May 17 2017	July 12 2010
Ranking	#657	#652

Search GeForce2 MX 100/200 on Amazon

Search GeForce4 MX 460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.