G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6670 vs Radeon R7 A8-8650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6670 vs Radeon R7 A8-8650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6670

2010

Why buy it

✅94.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
102% HIGHER MSRP
$99 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌733.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 A8-8650

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Delivers 100.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.7 vs 7.3 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 250W, a 220W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6670 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 94.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (725 vs 719), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 6670 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 A8-8650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 100.4% (14.7 vs 7.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A8-8650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 6670 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 6670 vs Radeon R7 A8-8650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6670

The Radeon HD 6670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 725 points. Launch price was $369.

Radeon R7 A8-8650

The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 719 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6670 scores 725 and the Radeon R7 A8-8650 reaches 719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 6670) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Boost clocks: 880 MHz vs 825 MHz.

Feature	Radeon HD 6670	Radeon R7 A8-8650
G3D Mark Score	725	719
Architecture	TeraScale 3	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+300%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.703 TFLOPS+327%	0.6336 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	880 MHz+7%	825 MHz
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	96+300%	24
L1 Cache	192 KB+100%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 6670	Radeon R7 A8-8650
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6670 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6670 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6670 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-8650. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6670) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 A8-8650) — the Radeon HD 6670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 6670	Radeon R7 A8-8650
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6670) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon HD 6670	Radeon R7 A8-8650
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_0)+7%
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
OpenGL	4.4	4.6+5%
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6670) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 6670) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 A8-8650).

Feature	Radeon HD 6670	Radeon R7 A8-8650
Encoder	None	VCE 2.0
Decoder	UVD 3.0	UVD 6.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6670 draws 250W versus the Radeon R7 A8-8650's 30W — a 157.1% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon HD 6670) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 72.

Feature	Radeon HD 6670	Radeon R7 A8-8650
TDP	250W	30W-88%
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75	72-4%
Perf/Watt	2.9	24.0+728%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 6670 came in at $99, while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-8650 was 50.5% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.3 (Radeon HD 6670) vs 14.7 (Radeon R7 A8-8650) — the Radeon R7 A8-8650 offers 101.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A8-8650 (2014 vs 2010).

Feature	Radeon HD 6670	Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP	$99	$49-51%
Performance per Dollar	7.3	14.7+101%
Codename	Cayman	Opal
Release	December 14 2010	January 9 2014
Ranking	#596	#890

Search Radeon HD 6670 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A8-8650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.