CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 6670
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 A10-7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6670 is positioned at rank 172 and the Radeon R7 A10-7800 is on rank 488, so the Radeon HD 6670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6670
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-7800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2010). The Radeon R7 A10-7800 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6670 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6670 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6670 | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $99 for the Radeon HD 6670, it costs 70% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 236.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6670 | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+236.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($99) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6670 and Radeon R7 A10-7800
Radeon HD 6670
The Radeon HD 6670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 725 points. Launch price was $369.
Radeon R7 A10-7800
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 740 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6670 scores 725 and the Radeon R7 A10-7800 reaches 740 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R7 A10-7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 6670) vs 3,840 (Radeon R7 A10-7800). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-7800). Boost clocks: 880 MHz vs 2335 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6670 | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 725 | 740+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 3840+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS+1227% |
| Boost Clock | 880 MHz | 2335 MHz+165% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 96 | 240+150% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 768 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6670 | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6670 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A10-7800 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 6670 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6670) vs 4 MB (Radeon R7 A10-7800) — the Radeon R7 A10-7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6670 | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6670 draws 250W versus the Radeon R7 A10-7800's 180W — a 32.6% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon HD 6670) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7800). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6670 | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 180W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.9 | 4.1+41% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6670 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $99, while the Radeon R7 A10-7800 launched at $155 and now averages $30. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 costs 69.7% less ($69 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.3 (Radeon HD 6670) vs 24.7 (Radeon R7 A10-7800) — the Radeon R7 A10-7800 offers 238.4% better value. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6670 | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-36% | $155 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $99 | $30-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.3 | 24.7+238% |
| Codename | Cayman | Navi 32 |
| Release | December 14 2010 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #596 | #131 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6670 and Radeon R7 A10-7800
