
Quadro K420 vs Radeon HD 6670

Quadro K420
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K420 is positioned at rank 220 and the Radeon HD 6670 is on rank 172, so the Radeon HD 6670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K420
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6670
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K420 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6670 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K420 | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K420 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K420 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $99), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 395.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K420 | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+395.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($99) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K420 and Radeon HD 6670

Quadro K420
The Quadro K420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 726 points. Launch price was $854.99.

Radeon HD 6670
The Radeon HD 6670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 725 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K420 scores 726 and the Radeon HD 6670 reaches 725 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K420 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K420) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6670). Raw compute: 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K420) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670). Boost clocks: 784 MHz vs 880 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K420 | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 726 | 725 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344 | 1536+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.107 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+28% |
| Boost Clock | 784 MHz | 880 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+17% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 192 KB+71% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K420 | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K420 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6670 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 6670 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro K420 | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K420 draws 108W versus the Radeon HD 6670's 250W — a 79.3% difference. The Quadro K420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K420) vs 250W (Radeon HD 6670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro K420 | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 108W-57% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7+131% | 2.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K420 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon HD 6670 launched at $99 and now averages $99. The Quadro K420 costs 79.8% less ($79 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.3 (Quadro K420) vs 7.3 (Radeon HD 6670) — the Quadro K420 offers 397.3% better value. The Quadro K420 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro K420 | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $99-34% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-80% | $99 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.3+397% | 7.3 |
| Codename | GK104 | Cayman |
| Release | July 22 2014 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #475 | #596 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











