GeForce 920M vs Quadro K420

NVIDIA

GeForce 920M

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K420

2014Core: 771 MHzBoost: 784 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 920M vs Quadro K420 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 920M vs Quadro K420 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 920M vs Quadro K420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 920M

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 16W instead of 108W, a 92W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro K420 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quadro K420

2014

Why buy it

  • 34.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 575% higher power demand at 108W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K420 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 34.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (726 vs 717), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 920M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K420 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K420 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 920M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 920M vs Quadro K420 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 920M

The GeForce 920M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K420

The Quadro K420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 726 points. Launch price was $854.99.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 920M scores 717 and the Quadro K420 reaches 726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920M is built on Maxwell while the Quadro K420 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920M) vs 1,344 (Quadro K420). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920M) vs 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K420). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 784 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 920MQuadro K420
G3D Mark Score
717
726+1%
Architecture
Maxwell
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
1344+425%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5084 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS+314%
Boost Clock
993 MHz+27%
784 MHz
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
112+367%
L1 Cache
128 KB+14%
112 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 920M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K420 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 920MQuadro K420
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 920M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K420 carries 1 GB. Quadro K420 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 920M and 64-bit on the Quadro K420. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920M) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K420) — the GeForce 920M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 920MQuadro K420
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920M draws 16W versus the Quadro K420's 108W — a 148.4% difference. The GeForce 920M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920M) vs 350W (Quadro K420). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 920MQuadro K420
TDP
16W-85%
108W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
44.8+569%
6.7
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 920M (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce 920MQuadro K420
MSRP
$150
Codename
GM108
GK104
Release
March 25 2016
July 22 2014
Ranking
#864
#475

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.