GeForce 920M vs Quadro K610M

NVIDIA

GeForce 920M

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K610M

2015Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 920M vs Quadro K610M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 920M vs Quadro K610M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 920M vs Quadro K610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 920M

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 16W instead of 30W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro K610M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K610M

2015

Why buy it

  • 1.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 87.5% higher power demand at 30W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K610M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 920M instead at 717 vs 714, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 920M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 920M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro K610M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 920M vs Quadro K610M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 920M

The GeForce 920M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K610M

The Quadro K610M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 714 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 920M scores 717 and the Quadro K610M reaches 714 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920M is built on Maxwell while the Quadro K610M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920M) vs 384 (Quadro K610M). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920M) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K610M). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 920MQuadro K610M
G3D Mark Score
717
714
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
384+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5084 TFLOPS
0.8632 TFLOPS+70%
Boost Clock
993 MHz
1124 MHz+13%
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24+50%
16
L1 Cache
128 KB
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 920M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K610M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 920MQuadro K610M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 920M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K610M carries 1 GB. Quadro K610M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 920M and 64-bit on the Quadro K610M.

FeatureGeForce 920MQuadro K610M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920M draws 16W versus the Quadro K610M's 30W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce 920M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920M) vs 350W (Quadro K610M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 920MQuadro K610M
TDP
16W-47%
30W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
44.8+88%
23.8