
GeForce 920M

Quadro K600
GeForce 920M vs Quadro K600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 920M vs Quadro K600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 920M vs Quadro K600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 920M
2016Why buy it
- β Draws 16W instead of 225W, a 209W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Quadro K600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quadro K600
2013Why buy it
- β 45.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- β2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β1306.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 16W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 920M vs Quadro K600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 920M
The GeForce 920M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.

Quadro K600
The Quadro K600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 722 points. Launch price was $5,265.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 920M scores 717 and the Quadro K600 reaches 722 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920M is built on Maxwell while the Quadro K600 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920M) vs 2,880 (Quadro K600). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920M) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K600). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 902 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 920M | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 717 | 722 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 2880+1025% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5084 TFLOPS | 5.196 TFLOPS+922% |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz+10% | 902 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 48+500% |
| TMUs | 24 | 240+900% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 240 KB+88% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 920M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 920M | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 920M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K600 carries 1 GB. Quadro K600 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 920M and 64-bit on the Quadro K600. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920M) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro K600) β the Quadro K600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 920M | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 920M draws 16W versus the Quadro K600's 225W β a 173.4% difference. The GeForce 920M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920M) vs 350W (Quadro K600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 920M | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 16W-93% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 70Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 44.8+1300% | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 920M (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 920M | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | β | $199 |
| Codename | GM108 | GK110B |
| Release | March 25 2016 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #864 | #318 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














