GeForce 920M
VS
GeForce GTX 285M SLI

GeForce 920M vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI

NVIDIA

GeForce 920M

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 285M SLI

2009Core: 576 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 920M is positioned at rank 355 and the GeForce GTX 285M SLI is on rank 409, so the GeForce 920M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920M

#345
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1000%
#347
906%
#348
904%
#352
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
822%
#353
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
816%
#355
GeForce 920M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#357
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#359
Radeon R7 M350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
#360
GeForce 920MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $54
98%
#361
98%
#362
Radeon HD 7670A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
97%
#363
Radeon Vega 8
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
96%
#367
GeForce 615
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
93%
#369
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
92%
#370
GeForce GT 730A
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 285M SLI

#399
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1479%
#401
1341%
#402
1337%
#406
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1216%
#407
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1208%
#409
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
100%
#410
Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP: $139|Avg: $35
99%
#411
99%
#412
Intel UHD Graphics 615
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#413
Radeon R7 A365
MSRP: $109|Avg: $55
98%
#414
Radeon 3015e
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
98%
#415
Radeon HD 7620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#416
Radeon R9 M390X
MSRP: $550|Avg: $120
96%
#417
Arc 8-Core iGPU
MSRP: $503|Avg: $400
95%
#418
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $20
94%
#419
94%
#420
Radeon R9 M385
MSRP: $300|Avg: $60
94%
#421
Radeon R5 235
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
93%
#422
Radeon R9 M375X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
93%
#423
Radeon HD 6620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
93%
#424
Radeon R5 310
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 920M is significantly newer (2016 vs 2009). The GeForce 920M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 920M.

InsightGeForce 920MGeForce GTX 285M SLI
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 285M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 920M and GeForce GTX 285M SLI

NVIDIA

GeForce 920M

The GeForce 920M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 285M SLI

The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 734 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 920M scores 717 and the GeForce GTX 285M SLI reaches 734 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 285M SLI uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920M) vs 256 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI).

FeatureGeForce 920MGeForce GTX 285M SLI
G3D Mark Score
717
734+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
G9x
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
256
256

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 920MGeForce GTX 285M SLI
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce 920MGeForce GTX 285M SLI
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 920M) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 285M SLI). OpenGL: 4.5 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 920MGeForce GTX 285M SLI
DirectX
11.0
11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL
4.5+36%
3.3
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 920M) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce 920M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI).

FeatureGeForce 920MGeForce GTX 285M SLI
Encoder
No
PureVideo HD VP2
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920M draws 16W versus the GeForce GTX 285M SLI's 150W — a 161.4% difference. The GeForce 920M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 285M SLI). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 95°C.

FeatureGeForce 920MGeForce GTX 285M SLI
TDP
16W-89%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
70°C-26%
95°C
Perf/Watt
44.8+814%
4.9
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 920M is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce 920MGeForce GTX 285M SLI
Avg Price (30d)
$40
Codename
GM108
N10E-GTX
Release
March 25 2016
March 2 2009
Ranking
#864
#753