CPU
GPU
GeForce 920M
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 920M is positioned at rank 355 and the Radeon HD 6670 is on rank 172, so the Radeon HD 6670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6670
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 920M is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The GeForce 920M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6670 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6670 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 920M.
| Insight | GeForce 920M | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 6670 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 920M and Radeon HD 6670
GeForce 920M
The GeForce 920M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.
Radeon HD 6670
The Radeon HD 6670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 725 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 920M scores 717 and the Radeon HD 6670 reaches 725 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920M) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6670). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920M) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 880 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 920M | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 717 | 725+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1536+500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5084 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+432% |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz+13% | 880 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 96+300% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 920M | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 920M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6670 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 6670 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6670) — the GeForce 920M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 920M | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 920M) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6670). Vulkan: 1.1 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 920M | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 11.2 (11_0)+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.5+2% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 920M) vs None (Radeon HD 6670). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce 920M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 6670).
| Feature | GeForce 920M | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 920M draws 16W versus the Radeon HD 6670's 250W — a 175.9% difference. The GeForce 920M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920M) vs 250W (Radeon HD 6670). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce 920M | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 16W-94% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 44.8+1445% | 2.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 920M is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 920M | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $99 |
| Codename | GM108 | Cayman |
| Release | March 25 2016 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #864 | #596 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 920M and Radeon HD 6670
