GeForce 920M vs Radeon HD 6670

CPU

GPU

GeForce 920M

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon HD 6670

2010Boost: 880 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce 920M vs Radeon HD 6670 Performance Spectrum

GeForce 920M

0.5 GB 16

717

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

Radeon HD 6670

2 GB 250

725

+1.1%

Radeon HD 3850

Mobility Radeon HD 5000 Serisi

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 920M vs Radeon HD 6670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 920M vs Radeon HD 6670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 920M

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 16W instead of 250W, a 234W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6670

2010

Why buy it

✅39.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌1462.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6670 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 39.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (725 vs 717), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 920M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6670 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6670 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 920M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 920M vs Radeon HD 6670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 920M

The GeForce 920M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.

Radeon HD 6670

The Radeon HD 6670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 725 points. Launch price was $369.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 920M scores 717 and the Radeon HD 6670 reaches 725 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920M) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6670). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920M) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 880 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 920M	Radeon HD 6670
G3D Mark Score	717	725+1%
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 3
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	256	1536+500%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5084 TFLOPS	2.703 TFLOPS+432%
Boost Clock	993 MHz+13%	880 MHz
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	96+300%
L1 Cache	128 KB	192 KB+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 920M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6670 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 920M	Radeon HD 6670
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 920M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6670 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 6670 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 920M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6670. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6670) — the GeForce 920M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 920M	Radeon HD 6670
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 920M) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6670). Vulkan: 1.1 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce 920M	Radeon HD 6670
DirectX	11.0	11.2 (11_0)+2%
Vulkan	1.1	N/A
OpenGL	4.5+2%	4.4
Max Displays	1	3+200%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 920M) vs None (Radeon HD 6670). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce 920M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 6670).

Feature	GeForce 920M	Radeon HD 6670
Encoder	No	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	UVD 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920M draws 16W versus the Radeon HD 6670's 250W — a 175.9% difference. The GeForce 920M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920M) vs 250W (Radeon HD 6670). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.

Feature	GeForce 920M	Radeon HD 6670
TDP	16W-94%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	250W-29%
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Length	0mm	168mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75
Perf/Watt	44.8+1445%	2.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 920M (2016 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce 920M	Radeon HD 6670
MSRP	—	$99
Codename	GM108	Cayman
Release	March 25 2016	December 14 2010
Ranking	#864	#596

Search GeForce 920M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.