GeForce 920M vs GRID P4-1Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 920M vs GRID P4-1Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 920M vs GRID P4-1Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 920M

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 16W instead of 225W, a 209W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,890 MSRP).

GRID P4-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,890 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌1306.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID P4-1Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (730 vs 717), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 920M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID P4-1Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID P4-1Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 920M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 920M vs GRID P4-1Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 920M

The GeForce 920M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.

GRID P4-1Q

The GRID P4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 730 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 920M scores 717 and the GRID P4-1Q reaches 730 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920M is built on Maxwell while the GRID P4-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920M) vs 2,048 (GRID P4-1Q). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-1Q). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 920M	GRID P4-1Q
G3D Mark Score	717	730+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	2048+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5084 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+849%
Boost Clock	993 MHz	1178 MHz+19%
ROPs	8	64+700%
TMUs	24	128+433%
L1 Cache	128 KB	768 KB+500%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 920M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P4-1Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 920M	GRID P4-1Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 920M and 64-bit on the GRID P4-1Q. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920M) vs 2 MB (GRID P4-1Q) — the GRID P4-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 920M	GRID P4-1Q
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920M draws 16W versus the GRID P4-1Q's 225W — a 173.4% difference. The GeForce 920M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920M) vs 350W (GRID P4-1Q). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 920M	GRID P4-1Q
TDP	16W-93%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	44.8+1300%	3.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 920M (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce 920M	GRID P4-1Q
MSRP	—	$5890
Codename	GM108	GM204
Release	March 25 2016	August 30 2015
Ranking	#864	#525

Search GeForce 920M on Amazon

Search GRID P4-1Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.