
GeForce 920M
Popular choices:

GRID P4-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 920M is positioned at rank 355 and the GRID P4-1Q is on rank 413, so the GeForce 920M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920M
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-1Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P4-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 920M.
| Insight | GeForce 920M | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID P4-1Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 920M and GRID P4-1Q

GeForce 920M
The GeForce 920M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.

GRID P4-1Q
The GRID P4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 730 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 920M scores 717 and the GRID P4-1Q reaches 730 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920M is built on Maxwell while the GRID P4-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920M) vs 2,048 (GRID P4-1Q). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-1Q). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 920M | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 717 | 730+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 2048+700% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5084 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+849% |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 1178 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 768 KB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 920M | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920M) vs 2 MB (GRID P4-1Q) — the GRID P4-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 920M | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 920M draws 16W versus the GRID P4-1Q's 225W — a 173.4% difference. The GeForce 920M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920M) vs 350W (GRID P4-1Q). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 920M | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 16W-93% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 44.8+1300% | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 920M is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 920M | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $5890 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $185 |
| Codename | GM108 | GM204 |
| Release | March 25 2016 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #864 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















