Quadro K420 vs Quadro K600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K420 vs Quadro K600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K420 vs Quadro K600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K420

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 33.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Draws 108W instead of 225W, a 117W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K600

2013

Why buy it

✅7.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
32.7% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌108.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 108W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K420 instead at 726 vs 722, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K420 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K420 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 33.4% (4.8 vs 3.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro K600 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro K420 vs Quadro K600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K420

The Quadro K420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 726 points. Launch price was $854.99.

Quadro K600

The Quadro K600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 722 points. Launch price was $5,265.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K420 scores 726 and the Quadro K600 reaches 722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K420 is built on Kepler while the Quadro K600 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K420) vs 2,880 (Quadro K600). Raw compute: 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K420) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K600). Boost clocks: 784 MHz vs 902 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K420	Quadro K600
G3D Mark Score	726	722
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1344	2880+114%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.107 TFLOPS	5.196 TFLOPS+147%
Boost Clock	784 MHz	902 MHz+15%
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	112	240+114%
L1 Cache	112 KB	240 KB+114%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.5 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K420	Quadro K600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K420 and 64-bit on the Quadro K600. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K420) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro K600) — the Quadro K600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K420	Quadro K600
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.5 MB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K420 draws 108W versus the Quadro K600's 225W — a 70.3% difference. The Quadro K420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K420) vs 350W (Quadro K600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K420	Quadro K600
TDP	108W-52%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	6.7+109%	3.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K420 came in at $150, while the Quadro K600 launched at $199. On MSRP, Quadro K420 was 24.6% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (Quadro K420) vs 3.6 (Quadro K600) — the Quadro K420 offers 33.3% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K420 (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro K420	Quadro K600
MSRP	$150-25%	$199
Performance per Dollar	4.8+33%	3.6
Codename	GK104	GK110B
Release	July 22 2014	July 23 2013
Ranking	#475	#318

Search Quadro K420 on Amazon

Search Quadro K600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.