
GeForce GT 730A vs Quadro K420

GeForce GT 730A
Popular choices:

Quadro K420
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 730A is positioned at rank 370 and the Quadro K420 is on rank 220, so the Quadro K420 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 730A
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K420
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 730A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K420 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 730A | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 730A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 730A holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $20), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 730A | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 730A and Quadro K420

GeForce GT 730A
The GeForce GT 730A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 743 points.

Quadro K420
The Quadro K420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 726 points. Launch price was $854.99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 730A scores 743 and the Quadro K420 reaches 726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 730A is built on Kepler while the Quadro K420 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 730A) vs 1,344 (Quadro K420). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 730A) vs 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K420). Boost clocks: 657 MHz vs 784 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 730A | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 743+2% | 726 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1344+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.009 TFLOPS | 2.107 TFLOPS+109% |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 784 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 112 KB+75% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 730A | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 730A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K420 has 1 GB. The Quadro K420 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 730A) vs 512 KB (Quadro K420) — the Quadro K420 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 730A | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 730A draws 55W versus the Quadro K420's 108W — a 65% difference. The GeForce GT 730A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 730A) vs 350W (Quadro K420). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 730A | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-49% | 108W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.5+101% | 6.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 730A launched at $75 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Quadro K420 launched at $150 and now averages $20. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.1 (GeForce GT 730A) vs 36.3 (Quadro K420) — the GeForce GT 730A offers 2.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GT 730A | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $75-50% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.1+2% | 36.3 |
| Codename | GK106 | GK104 |
| Release | March 17 2014 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #813 | #475 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











