Quadro K600 vs Radeon HD 6670

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K600 vs Radeon HD 6670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K600 vs Radeon HD 6670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K600

2013

Why buy it

✅4.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
101% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 7.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6670

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 101.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.3 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 6670 instead at 725 vs 722, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6670 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 101.8% (7.3 vs 3.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6670 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K600 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K600 vs Radeon HD 6670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K600

The Quadro K600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 722 points. Launch price was $5,265.

Radeon HD 6670

The Radeon HD 6670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 725 points. Launch price was $369.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K600 scores 722 and the Radeon HD 6670 reaches 725 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K600 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (Quadro K600) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6670). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K600) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 880 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K600	Radeon HD 6670
G3D Mark Score	722	725
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 3
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2880+88%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.196 TFLOPS+92%	2.703 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	902 MHz+3%	880 MHz
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	240+150%	96
L1 Cache	240 KB+25%	192 KB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+200%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K600	Radeon HD 6670
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K600 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6670 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 6670 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K600 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6670. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro K600) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6670) — the Quadro K600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K600	Radeon HD 6670
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+200%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K600 draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 6670's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The Quadro K600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K600) vs 250W (Radeon HD 6670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro K600	Radeon HD 6670
TDP	225W-10%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	250W-29%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	3.2+10%	2.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K600 came in at $199, while the Radeon HD 6670 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6670 was 50.3% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (Quadro K600) vs 7.3 (Radeon HD 6670) — the Radeon HD 6670 offers 102.8% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K600 (2013 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro K600	Radeon HD 6670
MSRP	$199	$99-50%
Performance per Dollar	3.6	7.3+103%
Codename	GK110B	Cayman
Release	July 23 2013	December 14 2010
Ranking	#318	#596

Search Quadro K600 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.