GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Quadro K600
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Popular choices:
Quadro K600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is positioned at rank 409 and the Quadro K600 is on rank 240, so the Quadro K600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K600 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $40), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 96.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+96.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Quadro K600
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 734 points.
Quadro K600
The Quadro K600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 722 points. Launch price was $5,265.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI scores 734 and the Quadro K600 reaches 722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is built on G9x while the Quadro K600 uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 2,880 (Quadro K600).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 734+2% | 722 |
| Architecture | G9x | Kepler |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 2880+1025% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K600 has 1 GB. The Quadro K600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI draws 150W versus the Quadro K600's 225W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 350W (Quadro K600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9+53% | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K600 costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.4 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 36.1 (Quadro K600) — the Quadro K600 offers 96.2% better value. The Quadro K600 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $20-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.4 | 36.1+96% |
| Codename | N10E-GTX | GK110B |
| Release | March 2 2009 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #753 | #318 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Quadro K600
