GeForce GT 340 vs Quadro K600

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 340

2014Core: 993 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K600

2013Core: 797 MHzBoost: 902 MHz

GeForce GT 340 vs Quadro K600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 340 vs Quadro K600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 340 vs Quadro K600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 340

2014

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $99 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 103.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 64W instead of 225W, a 161W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K600

2013

Why buy it

  • βœ…96.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    99% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 7.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌251.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 96.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 340 instead at 738 vs 722, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 340 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 340 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $99 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 103.4% (7.4 vs 3.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro K600 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 340 vs Quadro K600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 340

The GeForce GT 340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 738 points. Launch price was $89.

NVIDIA

Quadro K600

The Quadro K600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 722 points. Launch price was $5,265.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 340 scores 738 and the Quadro K600 reaches 722 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 340 is built on Kepler while the Quadro K600 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 340) vs 2,880 (Quadro K600). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 340) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K600).

FeatureGeForce GT 340Quadro K600
G3D Mark Score
738+2%
722
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
2880+650%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS
5.196 TFLOPS+581%
ROPs
16
48+200%
TMUs
32
240+650%
L1 Cache
32 KB
240 KB+650%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1.5 MB+500%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 340 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 340Quadro K600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 340 and 64-bit on the Quadro K600. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 340) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro K600) β€” the Quadro K600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 340Quadro K600
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1.5 MB+500%
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 340 draws 64W versus the Quadro K600's 225W β€” a 111.4% difference. The GeForce GT 340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 340) vs 350W (Quadro K600). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 340Quadro K600
TDP
64W-72%
225W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
β€”
Height
111mm
β€”
Slots
1
β€”
Temp (Load)
75
β€”
Perf/Watt
11.5+259%
3.2
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 340 came in at $100, while the Quadro K600 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce GT 340 was 49.7% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.4 (GeForce GT 340) vs 3.6 (Quadro K600) β€” the GeForce GT 340 offers 105.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 340 (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 340Quadro K600
MSRP
$100-50%
$199
Performance per Dollar
7.4+106%
3.6
Codename
GK107
GK110B
Release
May 29 2014
July 23 2013
Ranking
#777
#318

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.