Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs Quadro K600

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 615

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K600

2013Core: 797 MHzBoost: 902 MHz

Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs Quadro K600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs Quadro K600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 615

2018

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $99 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 97.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K600

2013

Why buy it

  • βœ…100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
  • βœ…Intel UHD Graphics 615 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro K600 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    99% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (722 vs 717), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel UHD Graphics 615 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $99 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 97.6% (7.2 vs 3.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Intel UHD Graphics 615 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K600 has the stronger long-term case.

Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs Quadro K600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 615

The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K600

The Quadro K600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 722 points. Launch price was $5,265.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 615 scores 717 and the Quadro K600 reaches 722 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Quadro K600 uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 2,880 (Quadro K600). Raw compute: 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K600). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 902 MHz.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 615Quadro K600
G3D Mark Score
717
722
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Kepler
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
192
2880+1400%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4032 TFLOPS
5.196 TFLOPS+1189%
Boost Clock
1050 MHz+16%
902 MHz
ROPs
3
48+1500%
TMUs
24
240+900%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 615Quadro K600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 615 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K600 carries 1 GB. Quadro K600 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 615 and 64-bit on the Quadro K600.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 615Quadro K600
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
1 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 615 draws 15W versus the Quadro K600's 225W β€” a 175% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 350W (Quadro K600). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 615Quadro K600
TDP
15W-93%
225W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
β€”
Slots
0
β€”
Perf/Watt
47.8+1394%
3.2
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 615 came in at $100, while the Quadro K600 launched at $199. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 615 was 49.7% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 3.6 (Quadro K600) β€” the Intel UHD Graphics 615 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 615 (2018 vs 2013).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 615Quadro K600
MSRP
$100-50%
$199
Performance per Dollar
7.2+100%
3.6
Codename
Amber Lake GT2
GK110B
Release
November 7 2018
July 23 2013
Ranking
#921
#318

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.