Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs Quadro K600
Intel UHD Graphics 615
Popular choices:
Quadro K600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is positioned at rank 412 and the Quadro K600 is on rank 240, so the Quadro K600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics 615
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 uses modern memory architecture. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 615.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $50 for the Intel UHD Graphics 615, it costs 60% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 151.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+151.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and Quadro K600
Intel UHD Graphics 615
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.
Quadro K600
The Quadro K600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 722 points. Launch price was $5,265.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 scores 717 and the Quadro K600 reaches 722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Quadro K600 uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 2,880 (Quadro K600). Raw compute: 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K600). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 902 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 717 | 722 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 2880+1400% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4032 TFLOPS | 5.196 TFLOPS+1189% |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz+16% | 902 MHz |
| ROPs | 3 | 48+1500% |
| TMUs | 24 | 240+900% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K600 has 1 GB. The Quadro K600 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 draws 15W versus the Quadro K600's 225W — a 175% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 350W (Quadro K600). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 47.8+1394% | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro K600 launched at $199 and now averages $20. The Quadro K600 costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.3 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 36.1 (Quadro K600) — the Quadro K600 offers 152.4% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Quadro K600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-50% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $20-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3 | 36.1+152% |
| Codename | Amber Lake GT2 | GK110B |
| Release | November 7 2018 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #921 | #318 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics 615 and Quadro K600
