GRID P4-1Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 615

GRID P4-1Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
VS
Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 615

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz

GRID P4-1Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 615 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P4-1Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 615: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P4-1Q

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • βœ…Intel UHD Graphics 615 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID P4-1Q is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    5790% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,890 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($5,890 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.

Intel UHD Graphics 615

2018

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $5,790 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $5,890 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 5685.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $5,890 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID P4-1Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (730 vs 717), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID P4-1Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel UHD Graphics 615 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,790 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $5,890, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 5685.1% (7.2 vs 0.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Intel UHD Graphics 615 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID P4-1Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P4-1Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 615 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID P4-1Q

The GRID P4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 730 points.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 615

The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The GRID P4-1Q scores 730 and the Intel UHD Graphics 615 reaches 717 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 615 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-1Q) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 615). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-1Q) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 615). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureGRID P4-1QIntel UHD Graphics 615
G3D Mark Score
730+2%
717
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Generation 9.5
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+967%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+1097%
0.4032 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1178 MHz+12%
1050 MHz
ROPs
64+2033%
3
TMUs
128+433%
24
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P4-1QIntel UHD Graphics 615
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID P4-1Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 615 carries 0 MB. GRID P4-1Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P4-1Q and System on the Intel UHD Graphics 615.

FeatureGRID P4-1QIntel UHD Graphics 615
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P4-1Q draws 225W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 615's 15W β€” a 175% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-1Q) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 615). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureGRID P4-1QIntel UHD Graphics 615
TDP
225W
15W-93%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
β€”
1mm
Slots
β€”
0
Perf/Watt
3.2
47.8+1394%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P4-1Q came in at $5890, while the Intel UHD Graphics 615 launched at $100. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 615 was 98.3% cheaper ($5790 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GRID P4-1Q) vs 7.2 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) β€” the Intel UHD Graphics 615 offers 7100% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 615 (2018 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID P4-1QIntel UHD Graphics 615
MSRP
$5890
$100-98%
Performance per Dollar
0.1
7.2+7100%
Codename
GM204
Amber Lake GT2
Release
August 30 2015
November 7 2018
Ranking
#525
#921

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.