GRID P4-1Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 615
GRID P4-1Q
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics 615
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P4-1Q is positioned at rank 413 and the Intel UHD Graphics 615 is on rank 412, so the Intel UHD Graphics 615 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-1Q
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics 615
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 uses modern memory architecture. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P4-1Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P4-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 615.
| Insight | GRID P4-1Q | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $185 for the GRID P4-1Q, it costs 73% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 263.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P4-1Q | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+263.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($185) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P4-1Q and Intel UHD Graphics 615
GRID P4-1Q
The GRID P4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 730 points.
Intel UHD Graphics 615
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P4-1Q scores 730 and the Intel UHD Graphics 615 reaches 717 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 615 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-1Q) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 615). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-1Q) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 615). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 730+2% | 717 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+967% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+1097% | 0.4032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+12% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+2033% | 3 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P4-1Q comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 615 has 0 MB. The GRID P4-1Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P4-1Q draws 225W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 615's 15W — a 175% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-1Q) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 615). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 47.8+1394% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P4-1Q launched at $5890 MSRP and currently averages $185, while the Intel UHD Graphics 615 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 costs 73% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.9 (GRID P4-1Q) vs 14.3 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) — the Intel UHD Graphics 615 offers 266.7% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5890 | $100-98% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $185 | $50-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.9 | 14.3+267% |
| Codename | GM204 | Amber Lake GT2 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | November 7 2018 |
| Ranking | #525 | #921 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P4-1Q and Intel UHD Graphics 615
