Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs Radeon HD 6550A

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 615

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
····
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6550A

2011Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs Radeon HD 6550A Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs Radeon HD 6550A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 615

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 233.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 23.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6550A

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $70 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 229.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.6 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Intel UHD Graphics 615 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 6550A is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Intel UHD Graphics 615 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (717 vs 708), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 6550A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6550A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $70 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 229.1% (23.6 vs 7.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Intel UHD Graphics 615 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs Radeon HD 6550A Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 615

The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6550A

The Radeon HD 6550A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 708 points.

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 615 scores 717 and the Radeon HD 6550A reaches 708 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon HD 6550A uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 480 (Radeon HD 6550A). Raw compute: 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6550A).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 615Radeon HD 6550A
G3D Mark Score
717+1%
708
Architecture
Generation 9.5
TeraScale 2
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
192
480+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4032 TFLOPS
0.576 TFLOPS+43%
ROPs
3
8+167%
TMUs
24
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 615Radeon HD 6550A
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 615 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6550A carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6550A gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 615 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6550A.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 615Radeon HD 6550A
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 615 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 6550A's 45W — a 100% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6550A). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 615Radeon HD 6550A
TDP
15W-67%
45W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
47.8+204%
15.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 615 came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 6550A launched at $30. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6550A was 70% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 23.6 (Radeon HD 6550A) — the Radeon HD 6550A offers 227.8% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 615 (2018 vs 2011).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 615Radeon HD 6550A
MSRP
$100
$30-70%
Performance per Dollar
7.2
23.6+228%
Codename
Amber Lake GT2
Onega
Release
November 7 2018
April 19 2011
Ranking
#921
#926

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.