GRID K140Q vs UHD Graphics 615

GRID K140Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 615 Performance Spectrum

GRID K140Q

0.5 GB 225

728

+1.5%

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

Intel UHD Graphics 615

Shared System RAM 15

717

0.0%

Arc A310

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K140Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 615 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K140Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 615: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K140Q

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Intel UHD Graphics 615 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID K140Q is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
25% HIGHER MSRP
$125 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.
❌26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.

Intel UHD Graphics 615

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K140Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (728 vs 717), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K140Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Intel UHD Graphics 615 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $25 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $125, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 23.1% (7.2 vs 5.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Intel UHD Graphics 615 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K140Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K140Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 615 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K140Q

The GRID K140Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 728 points. Launch price was $469.

Intel UHD Graphics 615

The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K140Q scores 728 and the Intel UHD Graphics 615 reaches 717 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K140Q is built on Kepler while the Intel UHD Graphics 615 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K140Q) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 615). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K140Q) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 615).

Feature	GRID K140Q	Intel UHD Graphics 615
G3D Mark Score	728+2%	717
Architecture	Kepler	Generation 9.5
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1536+700%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+468%	0.4032 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+967%	3
TMUs	128+433%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K140Q	Intel UHD Graphics 615
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K140Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 615 carries 0 MB. GRID K140Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K140Q and System on the Intel UHD Graphics 615.

Feature	GRID K140Q	Intel UHD Graphics 615
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K140Q) vs 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics 615). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

Feature	GRID K140Q	Intel UHD Graphics 615
DirectX	11_0	12_1+9%
Max Displays	0	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3rd Gen (GRID K140Q) vs QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 615). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs QuickSync.

Feature	GRID K140Q	Intel UHD Graphics 615
Encoder	NVENC 3rd Gen	QuickSync
Decoder	NVDEC 1st Gen	QuickSync

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K140Q draws 225W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 615's 15W — a 175% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K140Q) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 615). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GRID K140Q	Intel UHD Graphics 615
TDP	225W	15W-93%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	267mm	1mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Perf/Watt	3.2	47.8+1394%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K140Q came in at $125, while the Intel UHD Graphics 615 launched at $100. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 615 was 20% cheaper ($25 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (GRID K140Q) vs 7.2 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) — the Intel UHD Graphics 615 offers 24.1% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 615 (2018 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID K140Q	Intel UHD Graphics 615
MSRP	$125	$100-20%
Performance per Dollar	5.8	7.2+24%
Codename	GK104	Amber Lake GT2
Release	June 28 2013	November 7 2018
Ranking	#628	#921

Search GRID K140Q on Amazon

Search Intel UHD Graphics 615 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.