Intel UHD Graphics 615
Radeon R7 A8-8650
Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs Radeon R7 A8-8650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs Radeon R7 A8-8650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs Radeon R7 A8-8650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel UHD Graphics 615
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌104.1% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
Radeon R7 A8-8650
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 104.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.7 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Intel UHD Graphics 615 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R7 A8-8650 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs Radeon R7 A8-8650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Intel UHD Graphics 615
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.
Radeon R7 A8-8650
The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 719 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 scores 717 and the Radeon R7 A8-8650 reaches 719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Raw compute: 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 825 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 717 | 719 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4032 TFLOPS | 0.6336 TFLOPS+57% |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz+27% | 825 MHz |
| ROPs | 3 | 8+167% |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 A8-8650 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 615 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-8650.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 6.0.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 A8-8650's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-50% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 47.8+99% | 24.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 615 came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-8650 was 51% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 14.7 (Radeon R7 A8-8650) — the Radeon R7 A8-8650 offers 104.2% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 615 (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $49-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2 | 14.7+104% |
| Codename | Amber Lake GT2 | Opal |
| Release | November 7 2018 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #921 | #890 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics 615 and Radeon R7 A8-8650
